Search for: "Fair v. State"
Results 9921 - 9940
of 27,440
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2010, 8:55 am
The new case that changes the landscape is Pearson Dental Supplies, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:39 am
Broccoli, Williams v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 6:53 pm
Over 370 companies, including small businesses and Fortune 100 companies, and business groups showed their support for same-sex couples seeking the right to marry by filing a brief in the same-sex marriage case Obergefell v Hodges pending before the U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 12:06 pm
During jury selection, after the trial judge told prospective jurors the nature of the charges and said that defendant was representing himself, defendant objected and stated he took offense to that term and stated he was "going to 'defend' myself, not 'represent myself,' sir. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:02 am
The claimant therefore brought judicial review proceedings, alleging that the disciplinary proceedings were unfair and constituted a breach of his rights to a fair hearing under Art. 6 ECHR. [read post]
13 May 2017, 7:00 am
” F.T.C. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 9:37 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] AFP v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 2:08 pm
Even absent a license, the music may be protected by fair use. [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 5:05 pm
By Eric Goldman New Mexico v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 2:16 pm
Pool v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 12:03 pm
Richmond Newspapers Inc. v. [read post]
District Court's Personal Jurisdiction Opinion Demonstrates the Confusion That Remains Post-Nicastro
27 Oct 2011, 6:22 am
(citing Hanson v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 5:13 am
Lauredan v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 7:10 pm
South Carolina12-911Issue: Whether the citizenship of the persons on whose behalf monetary relief claims are brought by a state may satisfy Class Action Fairness Act's minimal diversity requirement as set forth in 28 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 4:05 am
Circuit remands case for district court to determine which company records, including from an internal investigation, were material to the defendant's defense "and to protect against the public disclosure of material documents in a manner consistent with Thompson's right to a fair trial," in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:24 pm
As noted in People v Paul, whether a foundation for the experience and training is set forth or not, it seems that, as a matter of fundamental fairness, defendant should not have to proceed to trial in a narcotics case unless and until a laboratory report has been filed by the People. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 11:39 am
On June 8, 2009, the United States Supreme Court issued another 5-4 opinion. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:51 pm
On Constitutional Interpretation: Originalism v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 6:17 am
This was underscored in the 2003 case of State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 11:33 am
(Other state laws may also apply, such as NY’s consumer protection act as interpreted by the People v. [read post]
