Search for: "Stevens v. Stevens"
Results 9941 - 9960
of 10,144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2017, 5:05 am
Here’s Why That Won’t Happen.Center for Public Integrity – Sarah Kleiner | Published: 8/31/2017 Seizing on the specter of Russian election influence, Democrats have ramped up their quixotic effort to blunt Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am
Key Findings The Maryland General Assembly is on the verge of adopting a vaguely worded, legally dubious tax on digital advertising in the final days of this session—now paired with new tobacco taxes. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 9:34 am
Maître Audet, the Board’s General Counsel, noted some possible questions arising from the pending SCC York University v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Guest Blogger This post was prepared for a roundtable on Reforming the Supreme Court of the United States, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 8:47 am
Steven J. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
Presiding Justice Steven Fisher, joined by Associate Justice Cheryl Chambers, wrote a partial dissent in which he would have remitted the matter to the lower court for a fact-finding hearing to determining whether Crown Royal's petition met the newly-articulated standard for dissolution. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:50 am
NRDC v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 6:04 am
Among the books which extensively detail the matters written of here are Jane Mayer's The Dark Side, Philippe Sands' The Torture Team, Jack Goldsmith's The Terror Presidency (Goldsmith is a former head of the Office of Legal Counsel), and Steven Wax's Kafka Comes To America. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:44 am
Even under Wyeth v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 12:22 pm
In Van Devent v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
Claims similar to Khanna’s were thoroughly rejected by the Court in 2003: JUSTICE STEVENS’ characterization of reward to the author as “a secondary consideration” of copyright law understates the relationship between such rewards and the “Progress of Science. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm
” I do believe, as Justice John Paul Stevens has said, it is only because the Court has moved more to the right that he would be viewed as a liberal. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
” The phrase “original public meaning” seems to have entered into the contemporary theoretical debates in the work of Gary Lawson with Steven Calabresi as another “early adopter. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
” The phrase “original public meaning” seems to have entered into the contemporary theoretical debates in the work of Gary Lawson with Steven Calabresi as another “early adopter. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:53 am
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:36 pm
" It has been a truism since Marbury v. [read post]
