Search for: "Works v. State"
Results 9941 - 9960
of 60,541
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2007, 4:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 8:33 pm
And none involves a government assertion of “state secrets,” at least not yet. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:57 am
By Daniel RichardsonHall v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 2:00 am
Willocks v. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 3:23 pm
It was held in People v Moore, People v Doyle, People v Colon and People v LoVerde that the testimony of the victim must be corroborated if the offense charged is intrinsically related to or committed in aid of affecting the sex crime. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 5:01 am
A scenario similar to Bullcoming’s was presented in Ohio in State v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:58 am
In Makutoff v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 pm
In a recent post at the Originalism Blog, he skewers the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Trump v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 10:50 pm
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is still working on her decision on Epic Games' motion for a preliminary injunction against Apple. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 7:16 am
When it comes to exclusions in an insurance policy, the Texas Supreme Court, in the case, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 12:03 pm
In addition, Kerk’s reliance on State v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 4:07 am
Supreme Court for argument time to support a challenge to New York City gun restrictions,” New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
Indeed, in Gooshaw v Village of Massena, 216 AD2d 819, the Appellate Division said that it is inappropriate to file disciplinary charges against an individual who is unable to report for work because of his or her conceded disability while in Penebre v Dzaluk, 51 AD2d 574, the Appellate Division ruled that §75 charges for misconduct should not have been served on the employee but that the employer should have proceeded under §72, Ordinary Disability Leave,… [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 6:38 pm
Thus and relying on the Third Circuit's work in United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 3:45 pm
The first in time rule, cited in Harcar v. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 4:03 pm
In Pryanishnikov v Russia ([2019] ECHR 614), a case concerning the authorities’ refusal to grant the applicant a film reproduction license, the European Court of Human Rights found a violation of the right to freedom of expression, as the only reason advanced by the domestic courts for the refusal of the relevant license had been based on mere suspicions rather than findings of fact. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:47 pm
Lindstrom is the solicitor general of Michigan, which filed an amicus brief with 19 other states in support of Mark Janus in Janus v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 1:26 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 12:56 pm
” Broadcast Corp. of Ga., 338 S.E.2d at 777 (quoting Florence Wagon Works v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 2:47 am
Altman worked at Steve's. [read post]
