Search for: ""citizen's united"" Results 81 - 100 of 3,975
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2010, 6:58 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Asked about his attitude toward the two decisions overruled in Citizens United, he said, “If it’s wrong, the ultimate precedent is the Constitution. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 4:23 am by Charley Moore and Eva Arevuo
Related articles Citizens United and the Montana Corrupt Practices Amicus Brief (dailykos.com) Under the Supreme Court: High court agrees to consider corporate free speech post-Citizens United (upi.com) Citizens United Gathers More Dissidents (legallyeasy.rocketlawyer.com) The Road to Citizens United (legallyeasy.rocketlawyer.com) {lang: 'ar'} [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 5:31 am by Brian Wolfman
Yesterday, we posted on President Obama's statement that if other means of curbing corporate election spending fail, he would consider a constitutional amendment to overrule the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:27 am by George Ticoras, Esq.
On July 16, presidential candidate Hillary Clinton announced she will “propose a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United” in her first 30 days in office if elected president. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:31 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court has radically altered the legal landscape for politics with the 5-4 decision in the case Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:06 am by Nate Persily
There are many ways to ask and answer the question as to who won in Citizens United. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 8:15 am by Erin Miller
There is no doubt that Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 7:52 am by buslawblogger
Back in November I had the pleasure of participating in a panel discussion of Citizens United that was hosted by The West Virginia University College of Law using Skype. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 4:48 am by constitutional lawblogger
Professor Patricia J Williams, author of the groundbreaking essay "On Being the Object of Property," has a few things to say about corporations as persons in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 6:52 am by buslawblogger
Bradley Smith come to talk to us about the impact of Citizens United on the most recent elections. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 5:03 pm by Nonprofit Blogger
Citizens United, a 501(c)(4) organization, sued the Federal Election Commission seeking injunctive relief because they feared that they would be subject to civil and criminal penalties if it made a documentary against a presidential candidate within 30 days of the... [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
Testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding her confirmation as a Supreme Court Justice, Solicitor General Elena Kagan summed up in a cool and even-handed manner the arguments she and her opponents in the Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 3:39 pm
123 Yale L.J. 412 (2013).The central flaw in the analysis of Citizens United by both the majority and the dissent was to treat it as a free speech case rather than a free press case. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 3:39 pm
123 Yale L.J. 412 (2013).The central flaw in the analysis of Citizens United by both the majority and the dissent was to treat it as a free speech case rather than a free press case. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:22 pm by Peter
Rendell apparently believes that the Citizen United Justices should have based their decision not on what the law was, but on what [...] [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 9:15 am by Katlin Newman, J.D.
On August 14, Citizens United filed suit in federal court against Colorado Secretary of State Scott Gessler. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 3:47 am by Walter Olson
” [LA Times] Given how execrated the Citizens United decision is on the left, should we expect it to cause a rift in the ACLU, which supports it? [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 9:36 am
The Supreme Court announced Friday that the audiotape of next Wednesday’s oral argument in a major campaign finance case, Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:45 am by Marvin Ammori
The Court--or rather the same five Justices appointed by Republicans who brought us Citizens United--held that Citizens United squarely forbids states from banning corporate spending on elections--whatever the facts in that state. [read post]