Search for: "*u.s. v. Brock" Results 81 - 100 of 105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2010, 8:07 am by ERIC J DIRGA PA
State, 315 So.2d 487 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975), Brock v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm by Schachtman
This is, as several commentators have indicated, quite wrong.1 Despite the widespread criticism of this mistake in the Brock opinion, lawyers continue to repeat the mistake. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., which involved a claim that birth defects were caused by a spermicidal jelly, the U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm by admin
Joiner, 522 U.S. 136, 145-46 (1997) (holding that an expert witness’s reliance on a study was misplaced when the subjects of the study “had been exposed to numerous potential carcinogens”) First Circuit Bricklayers & Trowel Trades Internat’l Pension Fund v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm by Law Lady
BROCK SPECIALTY SERVICES, LTD., et al., Appellees. 5th District.Civil procedure -- Striking of pleadings -- Error to enter order striking pleadings as sanction for refusal of plaintiff and her attorney to appear where written order does not make it apparent that court considered all factors set out in Kozel v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Ray Patterson, Pope Brock Professor of Law, and Laura N. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am by Schachtman
CONFOUNDING1 Back in 2000, several law professors wrote an essay, in which they detailed some of the problems courts experienced in expert witness gatekeeping. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 8:13 pm
Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969). [read post]