Search for: "Acus"
Results 81 - 100
of 692
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm
Agencies would do well to follow the ACUS recommendation when implementing the new White House order on guidance. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm
Thankfully, ACUS exists to tackle tough topics. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 8:18 am
¿PORQUÉ ACUÑA Y NO GUZMÁN? [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 1:17 pm
Among them is the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) database, which Jenkins members can access remotely. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 3:35 pm
The ACUS is accepting comments, here. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 9:05 pm
ACUS’s recommendation was a long time in the making. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 6:32 am
Acusó a jueces y fiscales de corrupción y favoritismo en el sistema de justicia criminal de Puerto Rico. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 9:06 pm
That earlier study resulted in a 2020 ACUS recommendation, discussed previously in The Regulatory Review. [read post]
27 May 2019, 9:05 pm
ACUS’s recommendation is consistent with the emphasis in the U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:06 pm
ACUS issued its multi-part recommendation based on these findings. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 7:26 am
See Michael White’s post re: publication of ACUS’ recommendations at http://www.federalregister.gov/blog/2012/01/2273 Filed under: Administrative Law, Conferences, Federal Rulemaking, Uncategorized [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm
ACUS is a federal agency dedicated to making recommendations to improve governmental processes. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm
In 2009, however, ACUS was reinstated and its funding renewed. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm
The extensive overlap between the two ACUS recommendations is a virtue, because it means that an agency will be able, in most situations, to adhere to ACUS’s advice without having to pause to decide whether a given guidance document is a policy statement, an interpretive rule, or a hybrid of the two. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 4:02 am
ACUS is also currently accepting public comments on the report. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 9:05 pm
In 2015, ACUS created a handbook on the subject. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:05 pm
ACUS, for its part, adopted our recommendation. [read post]
25 May 2021, 9:05 pm
The ACUS statement provides a series of factors for agencies to consult when making decisions about AI tools. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 9:03 pm
” Over the years, ACUS has adopted numerous recommendations to that end. [read post]
30 May 2019, 9:05 pm
ACUS Recommendation 2018-4, Recusal Rules for Administrative Adjudicators, reflects many of the conclusions contained in my report. [read post]
