Search for: "Agency of Natural Resources v. Persons"
Results 81 - 100
of 986
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2015, 4:31 am
”Ohio Assn. of Private Detective Agencies, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 8:20 am
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 9:45 am
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:57 am
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984). [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 11:30 am
Douda v. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 12:42 am
Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 am
In the court’s view only four of the six TRAC factors were relevant: (1) the time agencies take to make decisions (which is assessed based upon a “rule of reason”;(3) the extent to which the delay implicates human health and welfare, as opposed to purely economic interests;(4) the effect of expediting delayed action on agency activities of a higher or competing priority; and(5) the nature and extent of the interests prejudiced by delay.See, Vaz… [read post]
17 May 2017, 9:35 pm
To trigger a “public hearing”—again, the RAA’s term for formal rulemaking—the RAA requires a person to petition the agency for a public hearing. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 6:00 am
In a clever attempt to distinguish the Sea & Sage Audubon case, petitioner argued that Public Resources Code § 21151, subdivision (c), which creates the right to appeal a lead agency’s CEQA document does not indicate a fee is required to make such an appeal, and as such, no appeal fee can be imposed by local agencies for administrative appeals based on CEQA. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 1:40 pm
Cir. 2018); Natural Resources Defense Council v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 2:00 pm
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 9:24 am
The case of Farmer-Paellmann v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
" Accordingly, said the court citing Matter of Madeiros v New York City Educ. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 12:00 am
" Accordingly, said the court citing Matter of Madeiros v New York City Educ. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
They did not allow land to remain in its natural state, but over generations both developed it for a variety of commercial purposes and exploited it for mineral resources. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:02 pm
The FCC’s arguments were almost entirely statutory, arguing that no other federal court had found a right of “personal privacy” under FOIA, and that chaos would ensue if every federal agency — and the federal courts reviewing FOIA cases — would have to spend considerable resources delving into the nature of corporate “privacy. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 10:21 am
By Glen Hansen In Citizens for a Sustainable Treasure Island v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:13 pm
It was argued that this type of condition was in the nature of a private law contractual obligation. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 11:23 am
(Citing Desmond v. [read post]
