Search for: "Application for Water Rights" Results 81 - 100 of 4,585
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2013, 8:28 am by Thomas Merrill
”  The Oklahoma Water Resources Board would apply its ordinary rule of priority to all applicants, including those from Texas. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
 So enamored are we with preemption that we occasionally detour from drug and device cases to gaze at FDA preemption done right in other contexts. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 9:34 am by Sean Hecht
 Right-wing and libertarian interest groups, along with some land developers and industry groups, have been seeking to narrow the application of the Clean Water Act for many years now, and it clearly is a priority for Republican donors and think tanks. [read post]
They argue that the Commission erred in balancing instream and noninstream uses, and therefore the IIFS do not properly protect traditional and customary Native Hawaiian rights, appurtenant water rights, or the public trust. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:32 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Therefore, the panel agreed with the district court that the State Engineer’s approval of the applications to transfer the non-consumptive use portion of the applicantswater rights violated Administrative Provision VII of the Alpine Decree because the applications sought a change in the manner of use to a non-irrigation purpose. [read post]
The new rule is indeed more consistent with underlying Clean Water Act authority and generally streamlines the process for the permit applicant. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 10:06 am by Edward Smith
So this principle would obviously apply to a water-based sport injury, right? [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:00 am by Dianne Saxe
Thus, say the applicants, these changes endanger their treaty rights. [read post]
30 May 2011, 3:15 pm
As there was no application pending which would impact water levels or flows, there was no impact on First Nations rights and therefore no duty to consult. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 8:11 pm by Jeff Gittins
H.B. 84: Water Law - Nonuse ApplicationsHouse Bill 84, which is sponsored by Representative Tim Hawkes and has been recommended by the Executive Water Rights Task Force, clarifies that: (1) an approved nonuse application excuses the requirement of beneficial use from the nonuse application's filing date; (2) the filing or approval of a nonuse application, or a series of nonuse applications, does not constitute beneficial use or… [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 1:26 pm by WIMS
      In this localized dispute over water rights controlled by the so-called "Alpine Decree", the Appeals Court concludes, ". . .we agree with the district court that the State Engineer's approval of the applications to transfer the non-consumptive use portion of the Applicants' water rights violated Administrative Provision VII of the Alpine Decree because the applications seek a change in the manner of… [read post]
2 May 2019, 9:54 am by Olivier Theard and Andrew Mina
”[11] Further, the Commission found unpersuasive the NYDEC’s contention that statutory rights are waivable unless Congress affirmatively provides they are not. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:51 pm by Jeff Gittins
Both irrigation companies have various direct flow water rights and storage water rights with varying priority dates. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:43 pm by Jeff Gittins
  The bill adds some clarifying language that the section does not apply to “a period of nonuse of a water right during the time the water right is subject to an approved change application where the applicant is diligently pursuing certification”To read the full text of the bill as introduced, click here. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 12:31 am by Michael Atkins
It alleges the competing bottled water company’s registration of CASCADE ICE for water and application to register CASCADE ICE SKINNY COCKTAILS for cocktail mixes infringes Talking Rain’s trademark rights. [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 4:16 pm by JURIST Staff
She had also been documenting the illegal water hydrants run by the tanker mafia, who are responsible for stealing one-third of Karachi’s water and selling it to the rich, thereby depriving impoverished communities of their right to access water. [read post]
26 May 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
State officials determined the company has been unlawfully diverting water without valid water rights. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 10:30 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here are the materials: 2015-1-30 ME WQS EPA Response to Comments 2015-2-2 ME WQS EPA Decision Letter Attachment A 2015-2-2 ME WQS EPA Decision Letter Maine Tribal Fishing Rights Letter to EPA 1.30.15 [read post]