Search for: "Armour v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 136
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2024, 1:52 pm
Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 5:03 am
Bell in Benzing v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.I'm back to the Second Amendment because of this comment, because I find my own views on the Second Amendment so at odds with how I see the world, and because, frankly, I haven't figured out just what I want to say about Judge Bolton's order in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 8:00 am
Pineiro v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 7:50 pm
Weygandt v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 8:00 am
Smart Study Co. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
Cadbury Adams USA LLC (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) State Tort claim preempted by patent claim where pleading of bad faith did not meet Iqbal standards: Viskase Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
The Supreme Court concluded in District of Columbia v Heller, 554 US 570 (2008), that “arms” refers to “weapons of offence, or armour of defence,” or “any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes into his hands, or useth in wrath to cast at or strike another,” id at 647 (quotation marks and citations omitted)—terms that cover more than just guns. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 12:25 am
Rex v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:37 am
Stone (1936), ‘The Common Law in the United States’ 5. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
Greenhill v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:28 am
See, e.g., James v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
The 1773 edition of Samuel Johnson’s dictionary defined “arms” as “weapons of offence, or armour of defence. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition (forthcoming) Petitioner’s reply (forthcoming) Armour v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:58 am
Kelly Phillips Erb of Forbes reports on the Court’s decision to grant cert. in Armour v. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 1:03 pm
Because eBay isn't a state actor, however, the court dismissed eBay [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:00 am
In Burns v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 1:07 pm
” As such, the AP tells us that Russia’s military forces on its western border will receive 1,100 new weapons systems, including warplanes, helicopters, tanks, and other armoured vehicles. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
(IP Dragon) DuPont learns that global IP theft doesn’t stop at the border (China Hearsay) Europe The chocolate menagerie: General Court decides on bunny, reindeer and mouse shapes: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v OHIM (jiplp) ECJ rules on legislative limitations on copyright protection for designs in Europe: Flos SpA v Semeraro Casa e Famiglia SpA (jiplp) AG delivers opinion in Viking Gas A/S v BP Gas A/S concerning trade mark law and refilling of… [read post]
