Search for: "Axe v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 145
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2013, 7:06 am by Barry Sookman
—Feds Eye Social Media for Securities Shenanigans Tech Summit 2013 Recap – Innovation in Outsourcing Entitlement Matters Heartache and Sour Grapes on the Internet: A Lesson in Case Management Beyond Knowledge and Consciousness – The Development of Liability for Misuse of Trade Secrets in the UK CIPO releases examination guidelines for medical use inventions Knock… [read post]
7 May 2013, 8:24 am by Venkat
The banks submitted affidavits demonstrating that they had no activity or customers in the United States, and therefore they should not be subject to personal jurisdiction in the U.S. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am by Graham Smith
Different features of copyright can engage freedom of expression on different axes. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 12:58 pm by Florian Mueller
Google subsequently requested additional time to respond to Oracle's opening brief and these submissions.In my previous post on this case I summarized and quoted from the amicus curiae briefs of former Register of Copyrights of the United States Ralph Oman and three computer science and engineering professors. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:47 pm by Bexis
  We’ve received the same bone-headed response from an appellate court in a branded case, seeWimbush v. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 3:51 pm by Scott C. Idleman
Such an arrangement is not found elsewhere within the United States—whether one considers the federal government, the states, or even counties and municipalities—nor is it readily found elsewhere outside of the United States, except perhaps in extreme situations such as post-war occupation or the international refusal to recognize a geopolitical group’s sovereignty in the first instance. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:54 pm by Jim von der Heydt
 Citizens United and Parents Involved were good first overrulings. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 2:20 pm by Shelley Brown
Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court declared state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students unconstitutional. 2. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 8:46 pm
United States ((1971) 29 Law Ed. 822= 403 U.S. 713) Let’s see if this constitutional challenge goes any far. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:58 pm
New Zealand also permitted Facebook service after failed attempts at in-person notice in Axe Market Gardens v Craig Axe CIV: 2008-485-2676 and Canada did the same in Knott v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:30 pm by Barry Barnett
 But the maker had has registered the label/mark with the United States Patent and Trademark office. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm by Patrick
 The opinion is more or less mandated by United States v. [read post]