Search for: "Beer v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 515
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2007, 7:57 am
Sullivan, 532 U.S. 769, 771-72 (2001) (reversing granting of motion to suppress based on officer's alleged "improper subjective motivation"); United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 1:21 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Carpenter v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
Filed: June 29, 2022Holding: A Maryland statute that allowed certain beer, wine, and liquor license holders in a certain area of a legislative district to exchange their licenses for other licenses under certain circumstances and restricted the hours of operation for certain licensees in a separate area of the same legislative district did not violate the one subject requirement in Article III, § 29 of the Maryland Constitution and was not shown to violate equal… [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am by Carolina Attorneys
” Defendant reported he would drink “four to five 40 ounce beers a day. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 5:19 am
In fact, “Plaintiffs have not identified any indicators that other U.S. beer brewers believed that InBev was poised to enter the United States beer market. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 4:14 am
" As to meaning, applicant's mark "suggests a subset of Opposer's TEQUILA emanating from or associated with the United States of America. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 1:52 pm
As explained in the case of United Biscuits v Asda [1997] RPC 513, customers might be misled by the similarities of get-up, confusion has a broad interpretation and does not require an intention to deceive. [read post]