Search for: "Bexis"
Results 81 - 100
of 402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2011, 6:41 am
The following guest post about a couple of recent generic preemption opinions is written by Dylan Carson & Avril Love, of Tucker Ellis & West (a firm headed by Bexis' old Bone Screw compatriot Bob Tucker). [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:11 pm
Rather, it's a publication of the University of Pennsylvania Law School (Bexis' alma mater), and Professor Burbank teaches there (where he taught Bexis conflict of law). [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 1:05 pm
This post is the work of Bexis alone; Herrmann had to stay on the sidelines today:"We grow too soon old and too late schmart. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 4:23 am
But at least this time, we're sticking to drug/device cases.The first case Bexis found was Gilmore v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 9:24 am
Tomorrow we (read: Bexis) will analyze the rest of the opinion, which discusses device preemption, parallel claims, and off-label promotion. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:19 pm
Bexis’ firm, Dechert, was right on the cutting edge of all this, and that meant so was Bexis. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 5:51 am
Those responses may give us a clear view of our future (Bexis had a Ouija board, after all) if, knock on wood, the Supreme Court rules in favor of preemption in Wyeth v. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 7:46 am
This post relates to the Vioxx settlement, and Bexis is playing no role in drafting this.)We posted last week about the Vioxx settlement. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 4:07 am
One of our number, Bexis, does the same thing on the defense side for PLAC. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 4:14 pm
Because Bexis’s firm is involved in the Pelvic Mesh litigation, he is not involved in this post about yesterday’s opinion of the New Jersey Appellate Division in In Re Pelvic Mesh/Gynecare Litig., No. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 4:50 am
We couldn't have done much with it any way, given Bexis' involvement in (other) Vioxx litigation, so lets move on to something more interesting. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 5:55 am
Bexis' firm was involved in the case discussed in this post. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 10:00 pm
Since this post does not speak to drug or device law, Bexis bowed out of participating in this one, leaving Herrmann alone at the keyboard.)Here's the first issue we don't care about: We got a free book in the mail! [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
Bexis prefers to stick to drug and device law, so he played no role in drafting this post.A surprising number of folks have asked us whether blogging is a useful business development tool for lawyers. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 2:40 pm
Plaintiffs Legal Committee, 531 U.S. 341 (2001), preemption decision is probably the highlight of our (read Bexis’) legal career to date, sometimes there may be reasons when we don’t want to rely upon the Buckman Court’s preemption-based analysis for why no private Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”) rights of action exist:[W]e have clear evidence that Congress intended that the MDA be enforced exclusively by the Federal Government. 21 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 2:53 pm
This coming Wednesday, September 24th at 12:00 pm ET/9:00 am PT, three of your Reed Smith bloggers, Steve Boranian, Steve McConnell, and myself (Bexis) will be presenting a teleseminar that we've entitled, "And the Verdict Is…: Recent Trends in Drug and Device Litigation. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 10:39 am
Some time ago we posted critically about an ALI Restatement proposal (since tentatively adopted over our, or at least, Bexis,' vocal objections) that would abolish the requirement that expert witnesses hold their opinions to a reasonable degree of professional certainty. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
(They're partying with Bexis in Philadelphia; Illinois is feeling quite overlooked with Herrmann in Chicago.) [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 10:00 pm
Bexis got an unexpected present for his 51st birthday yesterday. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 10:29 am
First, Bexis's tongue is tied. [read post]
