Search for: "Brand v. Brand" Results 81 - 100 of 9,563
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2010, 11:02 pm by thelawprofessor
I’m not sure that the crux of the disagreement centers around using specific code owned by Internet Brands even though Internet Brands claims the code was “refactored” into something else. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:32 am
is not binding on the court but often predicts the likely result :Advocate General's Opinion in Joined Cases C-236/08, C-237/08 and C-238/08Google France & Google Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier, Google France v Viaticum & Luteciel and Google France v CNRRH, Pierre-Alexis Thonet, Bruno Raboin & Tiger, franchisée Unicis"..Mr. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:10 pm
  Cat v Robot hereKit-Cat Clocks here Kit Kat and Domino here [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:25 am
The White Cliffs of Dover Author Walter Mittelholzer 1894-1937 Jane Lambert Trade Marks Registry (Ms A Skilton) Re VERA LYNN, Lynn v Halewood International Brands Ltd, BL O/766/19 12 Dec 2019 Dame Vera Lynn was born in 1917 and is still going strong. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:50 am by Michael C. Dorf
Dept. of Commerce and Loper Bright Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 10:13 am by Charlotte Davies
Some believe this decision is contrary to the ECJ ruling in Copad SA v Dior (Case C-59/08, 23 April 2009), where a "trademark's prestige" and "the aura of luxury" were found to be "essential" to brand protection. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 10:13 am by Charlotte Davies
   Some believe this decision is contrary to the ECJ ruling in Copad SA v Dior (Case C-59/08, 23 April 2009), where a "trademark's prestige" and "the aura of luxury" were found to be "essential" to brand protection. [read post]
24 May 2013, 5:47 am by Steve Baird
” For the long drawn out answer, check out Fortress Grand Corporation v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 5:28 pm
Jane LambertIntellectual Property Enterprise Court (Mr Recorder Campbell KC) KF Global Brands Ltd v Lead Wear Ltd and others  [2023] EWHC 1303 (IPEC) (2 June 2023)This was an action for unregistered design right infringement. [read post]