Search for: "Bravo v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 191
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2016, 12:42 pm
On October 4, the Justices will hear the first oral argument of the new Term, in Bravo-Fernandez v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 4:49 pm
” Williamson v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 10:22 am
Fortune favored the Bravo-Fernandez v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 12:21 pm
The specific issue in a bribery and public corruption case, Bravo-Fernandez v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am
The first new relist is Bravo-Fernandez v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 8:00 pm
Bravo-Fernandez v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court agrees to review CRST Vans Expedited v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 1:03 pm
An interesting decision from the Arizona Court of Appeals last Thursday, in State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
Rule 16(a)(6) is a catchall clause that requires the government to “[a]dvise the defendant’s attorney of evidence favorable to the defendant and material to the defendant’s guilt or punishment to which defendant is entitled pursuant to Brady and United States v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 7:09 am
Bravo. 6. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 9:15 am
Mississippi, one of the first cases nationwide to implement the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Miller v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 12:51 pm
Quazzo v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm
Blake BrownCanadian State Trials, Vol. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 3:08 am
Bravo Company, 64 USPQ2d at 1601-02. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 8:32 am
Contrary to defendant’s contention, expert testimony was not required, inasmuch as ‘opinion testimony by a lay witness is competent to establish the value of the property if the witness is acquainted with the value of similar property’ (People v Sheehy, 274 AD2d at 845; see People v Adams, 8 AD3d at 894; see also People v Bravo, 295 AD2d 213, 214 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 556 [2002]). [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 10:42 am
The other New Jersey case from this week, State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 10:35 am
Vermont North Properties v. [read post]
31 May 2014, 8:29 am
The cases are proceeding in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York but ought to be airing on the Bravo network. [read post]
31 May 2014, 8:26 am
The cases are proceeding in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York but ought to be airing on the Bravo network. [read post]
6 May 2014, 12:37 pm
Pahnke v. [read post]
