Search for: "Brown v. Anderson" Results 81 - 100 of 196
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2014, 2:12 pm by Francisco Macías
 Earl Warren’s role in seeing to the passing  of legislation (the Anderson bill) in his state–after understanding the arguments brought before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals–certainly paved the way for the favorable outcome of Brown v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm by Ezra Rosser
(Re)Emerging Issues The Seattle/Louisville Decision and the Future of Race-Conscious Programs Philip Tegeler Separate ≠ Equal: Mexican Americans Before Brown v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ctr., 52 AD3d 269, [1st Dept 2008]; Brown v Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 137 AD2d 479 [2nd Dept 1988]). [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am by Mary Whisner
JohnsonThe Heirs of Brown: The Story of Grutter v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
Anderson-Wiley, 664 F.3d 865, 882 (11th Cir. 2011) (Pryor, J., concurring) (noting this as an example). [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 3:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(See Engelke v Brown Rudnick Berlack Israels LLP, _ NYS2d _, 2013 NY Slip Op 07419 [1st Dept 2013] [plaintiff could not show with sufficient certainty that, absent alleged malpractice, he would have been able to avert defending second lawsuit]; Natural Organics Inc. v Anderson Kill & Glick, P.C., 67 AD3d 541, 542 [1st Dept 2009], Iv dismissed 14 NY3d 881 [2010] [plaintiff failed to demonstrate causal connection between alleged malpractice and injuries]; Cohen… [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 3:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(See Engelke v Brown Rudnick Berlack Israels LLP, _ NYS2d _, 2013 NY Slip Op 07419 [1st Dept 2013] [plaintiff could not show with sufficient certainty that, absent alleged malpractice, he would have been able to avert defending second lawsuit]; Natural Organics Inc. v Anderson Kill & Glick, P.C., 67 AD3d 541, 542 [1st Dept 2009], Iv dismissed 14 NY3d 881 [2010] [plaintiff failed to demonstrate causal connection between alleged malpractice and injuries]; Cohen… [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:47 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In Commonwealth v Anderson, the Supreme Court of Massachusetts held that the Commonwealth must carefully comply with written, checkpoint guidelines and that "substantial compliance" is not the standard for a roadblock seizure. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ctr., 52 AD3d 269, [1st Dept 2008]; Brown v Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 137 AD2d 479 [2nd Dept 1988]). [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As a general proposition, expert testimony is properly admitted to help lay jurors understand matters that are not ordinarily within their understanding akin to People v Brown and People v Lee. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:26 pm by WIMS
[#Air, #Water, #CADC]   Quick Summaries Of  Additional Cases During The Break Anderson Brothers, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]