Search for: "Bruce Ackerman" Results 81 - 100 of 511
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2022, 10:52 am by Gerard Magliocca
These legislative discussions, though, need to consider some of the issues raised by Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment, as outlined in my new essay with Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 11:32 am by Pam Rentz
Please join the Lillian Goldman Law Library for a book talk with Professor Bruce Ackerman ’67. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 6:29 pm
Bruce Ackerman Gerry Hebert (whom I used to call the "Bailout King," but whom I will now refer to as "The Anomaly" (see Thomas, J. concurrence, fn. 1) Walter Dellinger, Linda Greenhouse, and Dahlia Lithwick (Slate's "The Breakfast Table") NPR... [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 2:35 pm by Steve Gottlieb
Bruce Ackerman, whom I know from Yale Law School, and Gerard Magliocca of the Indiana University School of Law provide a shattering and important analysis of what’s in store. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 6:58 am
Yale law professor Bruce Ackerman argues in the Washington Post that it was inappropriate for General Stanley McChrystal to announce his preferred Afghanistan strategy and publicly disagree with Vice President Joe Biden. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 3:46 pm
Yale law professor Bruce Ackerman accused McChrystal of "a plain violation of the principle of civilian control. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 3:19 pm by Steve Gottlieb
Got a note from Bruce Ackerman at Yale Law School reiterating an important point that he has been making in talks all over the globe, this one at the invitation of the Thomas S. [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 9:35 am
The Download of the Week is The Living Constitution by Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 9:55 pm
In the Washington Post yesterday, Bruce Ackerman and Oona Hathaway argued, not without some force, that when the current U.N. [read post]
20 May 2007, 8:56 am
Professor Jack Balkin has a fascinating post discussing Bruce Ackerman's theory of Constitutional moments, hos own theory of Constitutional change by partisan entrenchment and the possible Constitutional referendum of 2008. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 1:50 am
PRESIDENTIAL SUCCESSION: This Bruce Ackerman piece seems pretty thinly sourced. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 7:12 am by Robert Chesney
 So argues Bruce Ackerman in this op-ed, which ran in the Washington Post this weekend. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:02 pm by mv284
Still, if like me you thought the Constitution requires something more than a heads-up on this kind of thing, two recent pieces by Professors Bruce Ackerman and Oona Hathaway will be of interest. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 11:14 am by Kevin
Bruce Ackerman makes some important points that make this worth five minutes of your time (depending on your billing rate, I suppose). [read post]
5 May 2008, 6:32 pm
Elsewhere on this site, Bruce Ackerman and Jennifer Nou scold the Supreme Court for deciding the Indiana voter-ID case with nary a mention of the 24th Amendment's ban on "poll tax[es] or other tax[es]" that "deny or abridge" the right of citizens to vote in the federal elections. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 9:04 am by Jack Goldsmith
Kevin Jon Heller at Opinio Juris responds to Peter Berkowitz’s critique of Bruce Ackerman’s argument that a self-defensive attack on Iran would be unlawful. [read post]