Search for: "C. G., Matter of"
Results 81 - 100
of 3,569
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2011, 12:52 pm
NOTE: This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
19 May 2011, 6:25 am
See R. 1:3-4(c); Eastampton Ctr., LLC v. [read post]
18 Oct 2024, 1:49 am
Rule 48(1)(c) EPC H. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:44 pm
The patent, granted in 2011, had been opposed on the grounds of Article 100(c), 100(b) and 100(a) EPC for lack of novelty and inventive step.In the appealed decision, the opposition division had held that the process claimed in auxiliary request 10 did not add subject-matter and that it was novel. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:24 am
No conclusion can, however, be drawn from G 9/91 or G 10/91 on the required content or quality of the arguments in the statement under Rule 55(c) EPC 1973 or the written reasoned statement according to Article 99 EPC 1973 or Rule 76(1) EPC.7. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:10 am
§ 922(g)(1), 21 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 4:01 pm
Campbell and Tye C. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 4:45 am
From SSRN:> Ira C. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 12:28 am
G v Scottish Ministers & Anor, heard 7 – 8 October 2013. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 2:46 am
G v Scottish Ministers & Anor, heard 7 – 8 October 2013. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 8:14 am
G 1/03 and G 2/10 relate to different cases, so cannot prima facie be considered as somehow conflicting, but Board 3.3.09 made the currently pending referral G 1/16 while handling appeal T 0437/14 asking a.o. whether the G 2/10 decision effects how some aspects of G 1/03 shall be interpreted. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:50 pm
NOTE: This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 1:13 pm
Recent Published BIA Decisions:Matter of L-G-H-, 26 I&N Dec. 365 (BIA 2014); Board held that Fla. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm
On 2 July 2019, Advocate General (AG) Bobek delivered his opinion in Case C-240/18 P Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), advising that the EUIPO’s decision to reject the registration of the trade mark ‘Fack Ju Göhte’ because it was too offensive should be annulled. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 12:01 pm
A copolymer of ethylene and an alpha olefin having 3 to 10 carbon atoms, said polymer having (a) a density in the range 0.900 to 0.940 (b) an apparent Mw/Mn of 2 - 3.4 (c) I21/I2 from 16 to 24 (d) activation energy of flow (Ea) from 28 to 45 kJ/mol (e) a ratio Ea(HMW)/Ea(LMW)>1.1, and (f) a ratio g’(HMW)/g’(LMW) from 0.85 to 0.95. 2. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:43 am
The subject-matter of claim 1 lacked novelty in view of D1. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 11:45 am
Huw G. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Grace and Wisdom: Patrick G. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 2:36 pm
§ 541(c)(2). [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
Decision G 1/05 [3.6] states: “Thus in opposition proceedings under A 100(c) it is a ground of revocation that the subject-matter of the European patent granted on a divisional application extends beyond the content of the earlier application as filed. [read post]
