Search for: "CALIFORNIA v. WASHINGTON" Results 81 - 100 of 4,326
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am by John Floyd
California: Right to counsel applies at pretrial identification lineup. 1972 Argersinger v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 10:18 am by NARF
Washington (Aboriginal Title; Off-Reservation Fishing Rights) Rabang v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 12:58 pm by Kalvis Golde
City of Los Angeles, California 22-64Issues: (1) Whether Heck v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 1:33 am by Venkat Balasubramani
While I haven’t done close comparison between the laws of Washington and California regarding agency, I have to think they are similar enough that the difference in outcomes was not entirely a function of differences in state law. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Political Influence Operation MSN – Devlin Barrett (Washington Post) | Published: 7/29/2022 Federal authorities charged a Russian man with a years-long malign influence campaign targeting American politics – alleging he used American groups in Florida, Georgia, and California to sow discord and push pro-Russia propaganda. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 2:22 pm by Ilya Somin
California, thereby letting stand an appeals court ruling that upheld the bulk of California's sanctuary laws. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:58 am by Emma Snell
Dalton Bennett and Ellen Francis report for the Washington Post. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 1:31 pm by Charles Sartain
This case is pending in the North District of California awaiting a decision in light of City of San Mateo. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 3:33 pm by Edward T. Kang
In response to appeals from the U.S. trustee, and the states of California, Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and the District of Columbia, the court held that the Bankruptcy Code does not authorize the plan’s nonconsensual release of third-party nondebtors, like the Sacklers, thus leaving the states’ authority to file further actions against the Sacklers intact. [read post]