Search for: "CARTER v. STATE" Results 81 - 100 of 1,940
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2023, 6:20 am
Today's advance release habeas law opinions: Carter v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 3:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Further, except where there is deceit directed against a court, Judiciary Law § 487 “applies only to wrongful conduct by an attorney in an action that is actually pending” (Mahler v Campagna, 60 AD3d 1009, 1012-1013; see Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 35 NY3d 173, 178; Meimeteas v Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP, 105 AD3d 643, 643). [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by William C. MacLeod and Darby Hobbs
Chair Rodgers also noted the retreat from imposing undue burdens, stating that it removed guardrails essential to good governance. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
[On Tuesday, April 4, Georgetown Law devoted a session of its faculty workshop to honoring the publication of The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930-1941 (Cambridge University Press, 2022), a volume in the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States, by Mark V. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:12 pm by Elizabeth Howell
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Cabinet for Health and Family Services; Angela Lane; Jessica Humphrey; and Jennifer Clay v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
On 22 March 2023, the defendant’s application for summary judgement was dismissed in the case of Frati v Bowen-Carter [2023] EWHC 627 (KB). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
United States, Rule 10b-5, SEC enforcement, Securities fraud, United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
United States, Rule 10b-5, SEC enforcement, Securities fraud, United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am by INFORRM
On 13 March 2023, judgment was handed down on the issue of contempt of court in the case of Frati v Bowen Carter in favour of the claimant. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
” 26 civil society groups, including Privacy International and Open Rights Group signed an open letter to Secretary of State, Michelle Donelan, stating that the “ill-considered proposals…endanger UK residents and UK data protection. [read post]