Search for: "California Company v. Price"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,494
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2009, 11:16 am
See Khan v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:19 am
Yesterday's Daily Journal had a story (no link available) by Laura Ernde on Monday's Supreme Court ruling in Clayworth v. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 6:42 pm
But of course, the argument here is that Amazon does in fact have control over these overseas companies and can force them to insure Amazon.Amazon also contended (as all internet companies do) that, regardless of its liability under California law, it is shielded by the federal Communications Decency Act (1996). [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 8:20 am
In David Biancalana v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:14 pm
The purpose of California Business and Professions Code § 6129, says the court in Soni v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 6:06 am
Luman v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 6:00 am
In Chavez v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Code, § 17200 et seq.) that is based on a trucking company's alleged violation of state labor and insurance laws "related to the price, route, or service" of the company and, therefore, preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (49 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 12:04 pm
V. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 11:25 pm
For example, under California’s antitrust statute—the Cartwright Act—it appears that resale-price-maintenance agreements may still be per se unlawful (although the California Supreme Court has not definitively addressed it since Leegin). [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:39 pm
In the case of Martinez v. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 12:07 pm
Harris v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
Koh v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 9:47 am
In Busse v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:59 pm
In Raul Ceron v. 321 Henderson Receivables, No. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:08 am
In a new lawsuit in California’s Northern District, a family trust is alleging that Lyft Inc. misled investors in documents supporting its recent IPO regarding the company's national market share, safety issues regarding its bike sharing business, and labor issues, causing the share price to be artificially inflated and resulting in investor losses when the truth came out (Malig v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 5:35 pm
Hunter Laboratories v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:33 am
” Last month the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision of a California District Court Judge’s in the case John Doe I, et. al. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:15 am
For example, if a for-profit company owns a non-profit company that acts as its charitable arm, it appears the non-profit company may qualify as an “entity. [read post]
