Search for: "California v. Garrett" Results 81 - 100 of 143
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2016, 7:48 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Zubik v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 5:11 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court issued its decision in Luis v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:13 am by Andrew Hamm
Minnesota, Birchfield v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
On 1 March 2016, Sharp and Hamblen LJJ heard a renewed application for permission to appeal in the case of Sloutsker v Romanova. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Amy Howe
United States and the judicial-recusal case Williams v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 7:46 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Evenwel v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 5:07 am by Amy Howe
Coverage of and commentary on Green v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am by Amy Howe
The second case is Luis v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 6:08 am by Amy Howe
” In his column for The Atlantic, Garrett Epps previews Sturgeon v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 8:02 am
“New Orleans Prosecutorial Disclosure in Practice after Connick v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 3:23 am by Broc Romanek
Here’s the intro from this Cooley blog by Cydney Posner (and here’s a blog on whether Congress will actually revisit the conflict minerals rule): According to this article from the Washington Post with Bloomberg, in February, House Financial Services Committee Chair Jeb Hensarling and three other House members (Scott Garrett of New Jersey, Bill Huizenga of Michigan, and Ed Royce of California) sent a letter to SEC Chair Mary Jo White urging that the SEC end its appeal… [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:35 am by Amy Howe
Gans weighs in on the argument in Armstrong v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am by Amy Howe
Jacobs covers last week’s grant in Horne v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 am by Amy Howe
 Independent Living Center of Southern California . . . . [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by Amy Howe
” Other coverage and commentary continue to center on Monday’s decision in Burwell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:37 pm
Garrett, Seventh Circuit: Appellant's sentencing guidelines were miscalculated after his drug offense conviction. [read post]