Search for: "Cariou v. Prince" Results 81 - 100 of 157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2012, 1:18 pm by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
I’ve been posing this question for a few years now, and my answer to that question, “yes,” has been validated by Judge Batts in the Cariou v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 4:28 pm by Gordon Firemark
Prince: (Last discussed in ELU019, April 8, 2011) IP Intelligence Report: http://www.ipintelligencereport.com/2013/04/25/appropriation-art-alive-and-well-after-second-circuit-ruling-in-cariou-v-prince/ Decision: http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/5da8dc66-179e-4dc0-94cc-09e213bfffe3/1/doc/11-1197_complete_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/5da8dc66-179e-4dc0-94cc-09e213bfffe3/1/hilite/   Cariou… [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Three types of cases: altering expression for new work: Campbell, Suntrust, Cariou v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 3:17 pm by Mary Minow
” In 2003, plaintiffs, including Bridgeport, sued for copyright read more » Cariou v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 4:56 pm by Mary Minow
The court looked to the Cariou v Prince decision, but complained that its approach to appropriation art looked only at whether a work is “transformative” and doesn’t fully address a copyright owner’s derivative rights under 17 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 4:56 pm by Mary Minow
The court looked to the Cariou v Prince decision, but complained that its approach to appropriation art looked only at whether a work is “transformative” and doesn’t fully address a copyright owner’s derivative rights under 17 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 4:56 pm by Mary Minow
The court looked to the Cariou v Prince decision, but complained that its approach to appropriation art looked only at whether a work is “transformative” and doesn’t fully address a copyright owner’s derivative rights under 17 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 6:43 pm by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
Confirmed Panelists include: Kirby Ferguson, writer and filmmaker (“Everything is a Remix”) Daniel Brooks, partner at Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis(attorney for plaintiff in Cariou v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:31 pm by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
Yes, an art and law panel that has (pretty much) nothing to do with the Cariou v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 5:00 am by Ben
The President of the Court was not convinced by Tuymans’ argument that the parody would be in the title of the work (which is not visible on the painting), nor by the fact that Tuymans adheres to the “appropriation art” movement - and readers might want to contrast the Belgian Court's decision with that of the US 2nd Circuit Court of Appeal in Cariou v Prince: the decision may well prompt a wider debate on just how far the parody exception… [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 7:11 pm by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
Richard Prince, Dexter Sinister, Mai Abu ElDahab, Exit Art, Brendan Fowler, Guerrilla Girls, Hans Haacke, David Horvitz, Douglas Huebler, Wu Hung, Jonathan Katz, Leng Lin, Jill Magid, Mass MoCA v. [read post]