Search for: "Claiborne v. United States" Results 81 - 98 of 98
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2007, 12:25 pm
  And the penultimate substantive paragraph also has this interesting discussion of the pending SCOTUS reasonableness work (background here):We pause briefly to comment on the status of this case in light of the Supreme Court's pending decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 9:20 am
Such an extension, however, would accord such upward departures even greater protection than they had under the mandatory Guidelines.In United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 6:03 am
United States (combined preview here). [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 8:00 am
  There is a lot in Pickett that merits highlighting, but this paragraph may be my favorite and the most important aspect of the decision (and not just for crack cases, but for all cases):While Booker and § 3553(a) instruct sentencing courts to consider all these "multiple and vague" factors, United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 8:23 am
United States, No. 06-5618 (cert. granted, Nov. 3, 2006); and Rita v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 5:36 am
While these criminal defendants might well have been prosecuted successfully simply for untrue statements, see generally United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 9:16 am
  Another example this week comes from Judge Avern Cohn in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 1:12 pm
" Judge Berzon, dissenting, begins her opinion this way: "The majority's peculiar interpretation of the word 'reasonableness' not only defies its common usage in the English language, but more importantly, runs contrary to what this court decided, sitting en banc, in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2006, 8:07 pm by Anthony Colleluori
In making that determination, is it consistent with United States v. [read post]