Search for: "Clark v. Superior Court"
Results 81 - 100
of 302
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
That all changed with the Pennsylvania Superior Court’s decision in the case of Spencer v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 7:36 pm
Superior Court, the ND Supreme Court ultimately agreed with the plaintiff about the last names. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 2:49 pm
CumminsSpecial to the Law WeeklyDanCummins@comcast.netAlthough a Superior Court panel in Gaudio v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 2:12 pm
District Court Southern District of Georgia, indictment, 4/28/21Georgia v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 2:12 pm
District Court Southern District of Georgia, indictment, 4/28/21Georgia v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 2:12 pm
District Court Southern District of Georgia, indictment, 4/28/21Georgia v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 2:12 pm
District Court Southern District of Georgia, indictment, 4/28/21Georgia v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
Clark & Ramirez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 1:36 pm
Accordingly, I agree with the result reached by the Court of Appeals and would reverse the trial court's denial of Clarke's motion to suppress.In Aaron Israel v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
Cummins is the managing partner of the Clarks Summit law firm of Cummins Law, a civil litigation practice. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 5:00 am
”In so ruling the court in Wingate relied upon the Pennsylvania Superior Court decision in the case of Blumer v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
Superior Court (Hohnbaum), 165 Cal.App.4th 25 (Jul. 22, 2008)? [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 1:21 pm
Cummins, Clarks Summit firm Cummins Law. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 9:28 am
Both of these statutes direct when a juvenile case must be transferred to superior court (mandatory transfer) and when other cases may be transferred to superior court (discretionary transfer). [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 2:46 pm
In Sprunk v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm
The Divisional Court ordered that the following two questions be tried as preliminary issues: first, whether the designation of the Upper Tribunal as a “superior court of record” of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, s 3(5) meant that its decisions were not amenable to the supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court; and, secondly, whether the decision which Mr Cart sought to challenge was amenable to judicial review. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
Cummins, Clarks Summit firm Cummins Law. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 9:53 am
” Gosschalk v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 8:22 am
Class Actions Clark v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:38 am
Caldwell in Mecklenburg County Superior Court. [read post]
