Search for: "Cooper v. Johnson*" Results 81 - 100 of 436
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2009, 12:05 am by Editor
4thCircuit-Seal.png In drug conspiracy prosecution, law enforcement expert testimony concerning the use of code words in recorded conversations (which was based on experience and testimonial statements from interviews with informants, cooperators and witnesses) did not violate the Confrontation Clause since the experts “presented their independent assessments to the jury” and “did not become mere conduits for that hearsay,” in United States… [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 3:11 pm by Howard Friedman
Plaintiff had complained that prison authorities refused to allow him to attend Nation of Islam services and receive The Final Call newspaper.In Cooper v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 3:10 am
On Sunday, the Chicago Tribune reported on the latest round of the Sugar v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:00 am by Mark Graber
  Georgia declared implementing the Supreme Court’s decision in Chisholm v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 3:46 pm
Cooper, Federal Practice and Procedure § 3932, at 470 (2d ed. 1996)). [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 2:29 am
 However, for whatever reason (but reading between the lines, perhaps their witness was not as cooperative as he might have been) no supplementary evidence was adduced to say that these were the slides he actually presented, and that the notes reflected what he actually said. [read post]