Search for: "David Luban"
Results 81 - 100
of 200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2007, 11:08 am
The always-worth-reading David Luban has this post on the possibility of a Marxist revolt at biglaw firms. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 1:48 pm
At the session, David Luban, who had read all of the papers, posed questions to each/all of us to elicit discussion on the topic. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 4:47 pm
Luban, David J., Time-Mindedness and Jurisprudence (2015). [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 7:21 am
Whatever one thinks of the "ticking time-bomb" scenario--and I agree with Kim Scheppele, David Luban, and others that it is remarkably unilluminating with regard to our present "war on terror"--at least its canonical form always involves someone who is plausibly regarded as the perpetrator or someone in a conspiratorial relationship with the perpetrator. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 6:23 am
John Steele's post here, David Luban's at Balkinization, and a series of posts (here, here, here and, oh heck, just follow the internal links for more) at Volokh Conspiracy did a great job of setting out the issues. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 8:27 pm
Check out his first two posts, just below David Luban's important Commander in Chief post. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 8:23 am
Rhode & David Luban eds., 2006)Shon Hopwood, Law ManDownload the full text of the article from SSRN at the link. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 10:14 pm
For topnotch analysis of legal issues in the suit, check out this new post by our colleague David Luban.Particularly notable: David's recap of U.S. prosecutions against German government lawyers "in the second round of Nuremberg trials. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 6:28 am
”) For much greater detail on this and related points about the CIA and the law, see my Balkinization posts here, here, here, here, and here, and David Luban’s post here. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 3:13 pm
Bradley Wendel The Inevitability of Conscience: A Response to My Critics David Luban [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 10:33 am
In Opting out of the Law of War: Comments on Withdrawing from International Custom, David Luban responds to Curtis A. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 3:30 am
Bradley Wendel David Luban and I just finished a paper celebrating the 30th anniversary of the Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 8:01 am
David Luban, Georgetown University Law Center, is publishing Arendt on the Crime of Crimes in Ratio Juris (forthcoming). [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 9:30 am
In support of his recent post at Balkinization, David Luban now links to Douglas Litowitz's book, The Destruction of Young Lawyers which has a chapter making points quite similar to Luban's. [read post]
17 May 2009, 8:52 am
UPDATE: David Luban has posted his written testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee, which concisely states the case that the torture memos breached legal ethics. [read post]
8 May 2008, 11:44 am
Rev. 405 (2008) David Luban, On the Commander in Chief Power, 81 S. [read post]
17 May 2007, 6:08 am
Don't let the fast-moving Comey affair distract you from the other outrage of the month -- the fact that at the same time high-ranking military leaders are disclaiming torture and abuse in the strongest possible terms, most of the leading presidential candidates of the Republican Party have been tripping over themselves in an effort to be the candidate who will commit to greatest number of war crimes, treaty breaches and statutory violations if he should be so fortunate as to be elected… [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 6:35 pm
Cimini RESPONSE Military Lawyering and Professional Independence in the War on Terror: A Response to David Luban Major General Charles J. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:55 pm
by Kevin Jon Heller David Luban and Stuart Taylor are having an interesting exchange at Balkinization over whether the CIA’s use of waterboarding qualifies as torture under the federal torture statute, 18 USC 2340. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm
In making law king, American lawyers became integral to the exercise of political power, so integral to law that legal ethics philosopher David Luban concluded, “lawyers are the law. [read post]
