Search for: "David v. King" Results 81 - 100 of 872
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2014, 3:30 am by Walter Olson
[cross-posted and expanded with a P.S. from Cato at Liberty] Even by his standards, Paul Krugman uses remarkably ugly and truculent language in challenging the good faith of those who take a view opposed to his on the case of King v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:49 am by Amy Howe
  At 10 a.m. the Court will hear oral arguments in King v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 2:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" in Teodorescu v Resnick & Binder, P.C. ;2010 NY Slip Op 20400 ;Supreme Court, Kings County ;Kurtz, J. we see what happens when plaintiff fails to name the individual attorneys,   "During the approximately two years this action was stayed, the attorneys who formed the defendant professional corporation, David Joseph Resnick and Serge Yakov Binder (hereinafter "Resnick" and "Binder"), were both disbarred. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 7:47 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
In an op-ed for the Austin American Statesman, David Gans discusses Fisher v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 8:00 am by Anna Christensen
King (09-1272) as improvidently granted ; respondent Hollis King had sought dismissal because the charges against him had been dismissed before the Supreme Court granted review. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Balkin, Democracy and Dysfunction (University of Chicago Press, 2019).David Pozen’s post suggests that what I call “the Constitution of settlement” is in fact potentially less truly “settled” than it may seem to be. [read post]
19 May 2015, 3:00 am by JB
King, and Ronald Reagan seem to use the founders. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 10:35 am by Guest Blogger
Timothy Jost On January 28, 2015, thirty amicus briefs were filed in the Supreme Court supporting the validity of the Internal Revenue Service rule in King v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 6:04 am by Joshua Matz
” At CATO@Liberty, Carl DeNigris and Ilya Shapiro discuss CATO’s amicus brief and a pending cert. petition in King v. [read post]