Search for: "Derek T. Muller"
Results 81 - 100
of 118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2024, 9:44 am
(Derek Muller hinted at a similar disposition last week.)Such a holding would have other virtues, as well: For example, it would not preclude the states from excluding candidates from the ballot when they clearly can’t serve (e.g., if they are 27 or were born in Guyana or have already been elected twice), because the state's justifications for doing so are far stronger. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 9:07 pm
Derek Muller posted a thread that explains some of the more important changes from prior version of the bill. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:15 am
I don’t know. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 8:23 am
And legislative veterans say they don't know how the vote will turn out. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 12:22 pm
I am less familiar with Muller's views. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 3:40 am
Derek Muller unpacks the decision at Excess of Democracy. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am
Commentary comes from Derek T. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 4:38 am
Louis Post-Dispatch, Derek Muller dubs Judge Raymond Gruender of the U.S. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 6:08 am
Commentary comes from Derek Muller at Excess of Democracy, who recaps the oral argument and concludes that the “case went in so many directions, it’s hard to identify how the Court might proceed. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 1:33 pm
Preventing state governments from, in effect, changing the rules after election day, in order to reverse election results they don't like. 2. [read post]
14 May 2020, 12:13 am
(See Derek Muller's post). [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 5:11 pm
As for the underlying legal question in the Supreme Court case—the "Purcell Principle"—Derek Muller offers some thoughts at Excess of Democracy. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:34 pm
(Derek Muller proposed this amendment.) [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 8:14 am
Derek Muller for the pointer. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 4:07 am
” At Excess of Democracy, Derek Muller tries to determine which recent justices “attract the most academic attention,” concluding that “Justice Scalia dwarfs all others, which was not surprising. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 1:09 pm
(Our analysis builds on the excellent work in the last few days by (among others) Matthew Seligman (see here, here, here, and here); Protect Democracy; Andy Craig; Derek Muller; Ned Foley, Michael McConnell, Derek Muller, Brad Smith, and Rick Pildes; and Henry Olsen. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 10:16 am
I'm sure I've missed folks, included those who shouldn't be on the list, and made other errors. [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:04 am
At Excess of Democracy, Derek Muller offers “highlights from oral argument,” noting that “[i]t’s hard to overstate how many times the justices asked either side about limiting principles—do electors have unfettered discretion? [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:17 am
” At the eponymous blog of law firm Ogletree Deakins, Ron Chapman and Christopher Murray conclude that “[a]t this point, the only thing that is certain is that the Court is divided. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 11:55 am
That contention, based largely on a 2015 law review article by professor Derek T. [read post]