Search for: "Doe v. Columbia University et al"
Results 81 - 100
of 142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
See, e.g., Igartúa, et al. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am
At about 12:40 p.m., Chief Justice Warren began to read his opinion for the Court in Case Number One on that Term’s docket, Oliver Brown et al. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 9:49 pm
The lawsuit is entitled The Authors Guild, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
Tinker et al. v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am
__________________________ [1] Redish et al., supra note 2 at 644-646. [2] See e.g., Bisaillon v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
His right originates in an act of congress passed in February, 1801, concerning the district of Columbia. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) I will be teaching a course on Corporate Social Responsibility. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 5:05 am
Tobin’s Q around the start of activist hedge fund campaigns (sample of all hedge funds campaigns) Source: Cremers et al., November 2015, page 44. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:40 pm
Nation Enterprises et al., 471 U.S. 539 (1985). [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
18 May 2021, 4:08 pm
’ In Reyes et al v Chile (2017), the Committee held that the government’s mandate to guarantee order and public safety, without the necessary safeguards against unfettered discretion — are insufficient in themselves to serve as the sole legal basis required by article 19 (3) of the Covenant. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
Their counsel placed their reliance upon Professor Martin Wells, a statistician on the faculty of Cornell University. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(Afro-IP) Europe Advocate General opines advertisement comparing perfume to L’Oreal’s did not infringe trade marks; translation issue: L’Oréal v Bellure (Out-Law) (IPKat) (Class 46) (IPKat) (Class 46) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) Advocate General opines in Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening concerning the storing and printing of small amounts of text extract from newspapers (IPKat),… [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
District Court for the District of Columbia against the Defense and Treasury departments for alleged violations of their due process rights. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm
Babak Sarani, et al., Wounding Patterns Based on Firearm Type in Civilian Public Mass Shootings in the United States, 228 J. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 5:16 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California issued a preliminary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs in the case Regents of the University of California, et al. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, et al., Respondents, vDavid Paterson, & c., et al., Appellants. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
