Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 81 - 100 of 12,292
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2020, 2:10 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The decision to refuse the application refers to a previous communication of the Examining Division, dated 27 June 2013. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 2:00 pm
On September 27, 2013, the District of Columbia District Court applied D.C.'s anti-SLAPP act, D.C. [read post]
28 May 2010, 8:42 am by Francis G.X. Pileggi
May 27, 2010), read opinion here  which affirmed an arbitration award that granted $1 million in punitive damages. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 11:11 am by Jon Sands
The panel concludes that Rehaif does not alter the conclusion. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 3:01 am
The Instructions come into full effect from 1 January 2010. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 12:12 pm by Ray Beckerman
John Does 1-27, 284 F.R.D. 165, 171 (S.D.N.Y. 2012), “if the Motion Picture is considered obscene, it may not be eligible for copyright protection. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 3:51 pm by William Morriss
It's a page which contains all the pleadings from Microsoft's current case against John Does 1-27 (aka the "Waledac" botnet). [read post]
2 May 2014, 3:00 am
This requirement does not apply to smoke alarms that have been ordered by, or are in the inventory of, an owner, managing agent, contractor, wholesaler, or retailer on or before July 1, 2014, until July 1, 2015. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 5:33 am
What difference at this point does it make? [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 2:09 pm
LexisNexis is hosting a free webinar on the new Lexis feature called "Ravel View" on Friday, July 27, 2018 from 12:30-1:00 pm. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 11:16 am
Notably, the sequestration is separate from the continuing resolution funding the federal government that ends on March 27, 2013. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 5:41 pm
University of Chicago Hospitals, No. 1-06-3080 (May 27, 2008) 5th div. [read post]