Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 81 - 100
of 6,389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2020, 6:17 am
In Sim v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 3:39 am
The recent Belgian decision in SABAM v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 12:52 pm
The case is R (Gentle & Ors) v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 4:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 4:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 3:15 am
Mirga v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; Samin v Westminster City Council, heard 9-10 March 2015. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 7:57 am
State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 7:23 am
Erskine's position was quoted by the defense in the 1806 case United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2006, 8:18 am
In the context of an action for the recognition of an English money judgment in the District of Columbia, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit confirmed the preclusive effect of the Act of State doctrine. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:57 am
In 1976, in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 1:39 am
In National Navigation Co v Endesa Generacion SA [2009] EWHC 196 (Comm) a shipowner, National Navigation Co (National) made two applications to the English court in relation to a dispute with a Spanish electricity company, Endesa Generacion SA (Endesa). [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 5:04 pm
(I previewed the case in Plain English yesterday.) [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 7:19 am
Gallagher and Mount Holly v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 2:31 am
NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina Court of Appeal “An English Court had no jurisdiction to enforce a United States court judgment since there was no treaty between the two countries for the mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments; the appropriate way was to bring an action on the judgment in England to enforce it. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:55 am
British Imperialism, the Indian Independence Movement, and the Racial Eligibility Provisions of the Naturalization Act: United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 10:33 am
On October 3, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 2:30 am
Let’s talk about the case in Plain English. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
Arizona v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:30 pm
+ come(v.). [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 10:31 am
Concerning the UK decisions, the Hague Court of Appeal states (4.3): “Departing from the said criterion the Court of Appeal, other than the judge in summary proceedings and the English High Court and Court of Appeal, partly because of different insights (more in particular after reading of the priority document) and partly because of other arguments of parties…”.Now this is jolly interesting, thinks this moggy. [read post]
