Search for: "Ex Parte Bailey" Results 81 - 100 of 106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am by The Legal Blog
Justice Dalveer BhandariSupreme Court of IndiaJustice Dalveer Bhandari and Justice H.L. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
The Bankruptcy Court rejected both arguments, granted Espinosa's motion in relevant part, denied United's cross-motion, and ordered all claimants to cease and desist their collection efforts. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
This is one of a series of posts that will excerpt sections from the third edition of my book, Day on Torts: Leading Tennessee Tort Cases. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 3:50 am by SHG
*A key witness, Keith Douglas Zlomsowitch, was never called, though Bailey claims Zlomsowitch would have testified that Simpson wasn't jealous of other men's relationships with his ex-wife. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 4:49 am by Ed Wallis
Lawyers for ex-Seroquel users countered that since all MDL proceedings had been wrapped up, the cases should be sent back to their home courts starting next month. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:01 pm
Yamil Berard, who gave us  the excellent five-part series on problems with Texas autopsies earlier this month, has fresh information in today's Fort Worth Star-Telegram. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 9:56 am
The entry stated the sentence Roberts would get, some explanation of why and gave some history of the case.And:John Coughlan, disciplinary counsel for the Ohio Supreme Court, said the problem with the practice of having the prosecutor prepare the entry was that it constituted ex-parte (meaning one-sided) communications because it excluded defense counsel from being involved. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 3:26 pm
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.NFP civil opinions today (5): The Invol. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 6:11 am
View the article hereOf course he was given probation, he's part of the "Good Ole' Boys" club, and rules do not apply to them. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Bailey, No. 06-5576 Defendant's conviction and sentence for drug- and firearm-related offenses are affirmed over claims that: 1) a prior Kentucky state court conviction for second-degree escape did not qualify for a career offender enhancement; 2) there was insufficient evidence to support the convictions; and 3) the district court erred in enhancing his Guidelines offense level after finding that he had perjured himself at trial. [read post]