Search for: "Flower v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 373
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2014, 12:18 pm
Plaintiff alleges that Defendants approached Plaintiff about a possible collaboration to distribute the toy outside of the United States, which Plaintiff declined. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 8:29 am by Ronald Mann
On Wednesday morning, the Justices started with what might seem to be a minor tax case, United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Postal Service, seeking disclosure of aggregated, anonymized change-of-address data to produce reports about movement trends in the United States—data that reporters have obtained in the past. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 6:25 am by Samuel Bray
President of the United States (August 26) is a major new case about national injunctions. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 6:58 am by Susan Brenner
He left gifts, cards, and flowers despite her pleas for him to leave her alone. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:18 am by Matrix Law
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 11:40 am by Larry
The Supreme Court stated in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:57 am by Matrix Law
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
United States, ex rel. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
” Coverage of the remand in Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The United States Supreme Court can’t seem to make up its mind about race. [read post]