Search for: "Gibson v. Simple"
Results 81 - 100
of 104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
By now most Verdict readers have probably heard about Justice Scalia’s provocative comments at last week’s oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 11:33 am
Annual appropriations requires affirmative legislation each year, which as a constitutional matter takes a simple majority vote in both Houses. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:01 pm
House of Representatives v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 11:54 pm
Caperton v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 5:17 pm
Commonwealth Human Relations Comm'n v. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
Gibson v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 1:35 pm
In Righthaven LLC v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 11:57 am
Bitter Lawyer has the best list, with nine simple things to avoid. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
In this setting, states and cities argue that the anti-commandeering principle prevents the feds from requiring state and local authorities to affirmatively provide information about or access to individuals who may have committed immigration law violations.Perhaps the most important Supreme Court case on this point is Printz v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
IPSC Breakout Session II: Trademarks, Advertising & Consumers Relying on Reputation Jim Gibson Reputation: what rational consumers would use to decide what products/services to buy. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:19 pm
It won’t happen automatically and the decisions along the way are not simple. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
This was true in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm
” Critics assert, in particular, that the president seems oblivious to a 1993 Supreme Court ruling, Nixon v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
But at the end of the day, Ranked-Choice Voting for a single office like a governorship would generally make it harder for a fringe candidate to win with a simple plurality in a three-way race.Also, Ranked-Choice Voting requires a more complicated ballot, allowing second and third choices, etc., to be formally tabulated. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:47 pm
Evolves over time, but there’s no obligation to avoid waste if the property is owned in fee simple. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
”Raven should be considered alongside the 2009 ruling (almost two decades later) in Strauss v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In Raven v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 11:26 am
With its combination of three movies, it was deemed a “simple dance routine” and therefore uncopyrightable.[13] The letter reinforced that choreography is not synonymous with dance, highlighting the tension in how choreography is defined. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
” In challenging this federal directive, San Francisco relies on principles of federalism as expounded in Printz v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:02 pm
There are two simple explanations. [read post]
