Search for: "Halliburton v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2013, 12:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
In a development that has the potential to change the way private securities suits in the United States are litigated, the U.S. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:33 pm by Jonathan Moss
United States, 406 U.S. 128 (1972), applied; (2) determining, alternatively, that the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance set forth in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 7:34 am by Kara OBrien
Highlighting this difference in approach, both the Halliburton plaintiffs and the United States government (the views of which the Court had solicited) urged the Supreme Court to review the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Halliburton. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
In 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decided the following arbitration-related cases: In Cont'l Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 11:27 am by Kiera Flynn
United States, the Court affirmed the decision of the Fourth Circuit, holding that a federal sentencing court must determine whether an “offense under State law” is a “serious drug offense” by consulting the “maximum term of imprisonment” applicable to a defendant’s prior state drug offense at the time of the defendant’s conviction for that offense, rather than current state law, because the maximum sentence… [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 12:44 pm by Sheppard Mullin
In September 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed that holding in Jones v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 6:09 am by tom
UNITED STATES Tuesday, April 26, 2011 10-779 SORRELL, ATT’Y GEN. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 8:07 pm by Ben Cheng
The petition of the day is: Chevron v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Medrad, on the other hand, argues that this Court does not have the authority to dismiss its invalidity and unenforceability counterclaims as moot because, according to Medrad, the United States Supreme Court has held that a finding of non-infringement does not moot an invalidity counterclaim. [read post]