Search for: "Harding v. Hoffman" Results 81 - 100 of 125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2021, 1:38 am by CMS
   Lord Hoffman cited the intervention of trade body the BioIndustry Association in Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company [2011] UKSC 51 as an example of a particularly effective intervention. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 1:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Hard to categorize the types of devices emerging: the line between tablet and ebook is uncertain. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 3:46 am by INFORRM
Personal injury was argued not to be a proper guide for awarding damages in libel relying on the judgment of Lord Hoffman in the Privy Council in The Gleaner Co Ltd v Abrahams [2004] 1 AC 628. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
This is probably because some of the cited material may be hard to find.... [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 10:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  9thCir. then embarrassed itself in Hoffman v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 9:02 am
The all-time points leader in this hard-contested competition – which Merpel has just now invented – is Lord Hoffman for that unbeatable one-two combination in Improver v Remington which has had trainee patent attorneys reaching for their dictionaries for over two decades: “the patentee was intending the word or phrase to have not a literal but a figurative meaning (the figure being a form of synecdoche or metonymy)”.] [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Insurance cos. have a very hard time calculating the value of patents; it’s not just scope but novelty, obviousness, survival through litigation. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 10:51 am by Beck/Herrmann
We - and a lot of other folks - fought long and hard to keep principal place of business as a choice of laws rule out of the final Principles. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Hansen, Eric Hansen, Merrill Hansen, Dave Harding, Celia Hardwick, Kevin Hardy, James T. [read post]
20 May 2016, 10:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Very hard to think through what the difference might be if users had “more control. [read post]