Search for: "Harrison v. Long" Results 81 - 100 of 278
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2016, 4:30 am
"  And thus we have an introduction to today’s case, Tersigni v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 4:44 am by SHG
Are we to be serenaded by the Harrison Bergeron Symphony Orchestra? [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
From Katfriend and long-time respected IP commentator Ken Moon (AJPark) comes news of a 13 August ruling of the New Zealand Court of Appeal (Harrison and Miller JJ) in a software copyright and trade secrets dispute, Karum Group LLC v Fisher & Paykel Finance [2014] NZCA 389, which was heard this June. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It falls to the court to determine, as a matter of law, whether an express condition precedent exists in a contract (see Two Guys from Harrison-NY v S.F.R. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 5:17 am
 Wilkinson v London Strategic Health Authority is an interesting decision on the entitlement to copyright in training materials which has been sitting for too long in the IPKat's in-tray -- but you can read about it now thanks to Mark Anderson's to-the-point dissection of the issues on IP Draughts. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 4:42 am by David Oscar Markus
Bailey took it all the way to the Supreme Court and Sheppard v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 10:13 am
Meanwhile, if you want to get a taste of Dutch jurisprudence on the subject of taste protection, here's a link to an English translation of the decision in Kecofa v Lancôme. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 5:46 am by Gerard Magliocca
 The best example comes from the Jackson book, which explains why William Henry Harrison’s death in 1841 saved M’Culloch v Maryland from being overruled. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Dental Malpractice: NEGLIGENT TOOTH EXTRACTION CAUSED WOMAN'S BLINDNESS, SUIT SAYS, Harrison v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 2:08 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Statements of President Obama  made today (June 22, 2012) in celebration of the 13th anniversary of the June 22, 1999 Supreme Court decision in Olmstead v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 9:54 am by Eric S. Solotoff
Harrison, the Appellate Division decided the Monynihan should be given retroactive effect. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
  Well, not too long ago we (well, Bexis, obviously) was expressing his frustration with this indeterminate state of affairs with regular blog reader whom we 're not sure wants to be publicly identified, so we won't, and said reader mentioned that his/her home state of Wisconsin was in somewhat of the same boat.We didn't know that.Intrigued, we took a look and sure enough, just like in Pennsylvania, there’s (at least) a three-justice faction in the Wisconsin… [read post]
In addition to the key case of Rottmann v Freistaat Bayern [2010] ECR I-1449 numerous other authorities such as Kaur [2001] All ER (EC) 250, McCarthy [2011] All ER (EC) 729 Zambrano [2011] ECR I-1177 and Dereci [2011] ECR I-11315 were analysed and applied to his case. [read post]