Search for: "Hart v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Hodges: The Continuing Battle Over Equal Rights for Sexual Minorities in the United States, (GenIUS, December 2015, at 18).Philip T. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Finchett-Maddock & Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, To Open Up: A performative rewriting of Pendragon v United Kingdom (1998) 27 EHRR CD 179 , (Helen Dancer, Bonnie Holligan and Helena Howe (eds.) [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
The Supreme Court’s decision in Sackett v EPA, announced on May 25, 2023, was unanimous in that the EPA’s wetlands regulatory jurisdiction is limited to wetlands with a continuous surface connection to the waters of the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm by ernst
This book traces the development of the jurisdiction from the foundational decisions of Huckle v Money and Wilkes v Wood in England, to leading modern cases such as Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd in Australia, Whiten v Pilot Insurance Co in Canada, Couch v AG (No 2) in New Zealand, PH Hydraulics and Engineering Pte Ltd v Airtrust (Hong Kong) Ltd in Singapore and Mathias v Accor Economy Lodging, Inc and State Farm Mutual… [read post]
16 May 2019, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  Levinson and Balkin mention Shelby County v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
United States, makes that point only then to go on and draw the distinction. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:11 am by Daniel P. Hart
By Peter Talibart, Dan Hart, and Georgina McAdam In Part I of this post, we focused on the UK Supreme Court’s recent decision in Vestergaard Frandsen and others v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:11 am by Daniel P. Hart
By Peter Talibart, Dan Hart, and Georgina McAdam In Part I of this post, we focused on the UK Supreme Court’s recent decision in Vestergaard Frandsen and others v. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 7:26 am by Chukwuma Okoli
In a recent United Kingdom Supreme Court case in FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Lady Brownlie, Lord Leggatt (with whom the other members of the Court all agreed) at paragraph 148 held that: “[T]he old notion that foreign legal materials can only ever be brought before the court as part of the evidence of an expert witness is outdated. [read post]