Search for: "Hudson v. North Carolina" Results 81 - 98 of 98
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
Click Here North Idaho Developers Fined Nearly $45K for Storm Water Violations. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:42 am
North Carolina, 386 U.S. 213, 222-23, 87 S. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 11:20 pm
Ct., Oct. 9, 2009), the North Carolina Supreme Court upheld the 1996 levy of annual service charges on property of homeowners in a development that was created 100 years ago by an arm of the Methodist Church. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
Several years ago, I published a list of state-specific Family Law blogs. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 4:38 am
On the issue the Court held: Under both North Carolina and New Jersey’s UIFSA statutory scheme, the issuing state retains “continuing, exclusive jurisdiction over a spousal support order throughout the existence of the support obligation,” regardless of whether either party continues to reside in the issuing state . . . . [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
  BTW, three states have never ratified the amendment, North Dakota, Georgia and South Carolina, but that is of no constitutional consequence. [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:25 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court issued its ruling in North Carolina Department of Corrections v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
Box 68 Isle of Palms, SC 29451 Phone: (843) 553-3725 Fax: (843) 792-1593 E-mail: Down Synrome Family Alliance of Greenville 1021 Hudson Road Greenville, SC 29615 Phone: (864) 294-4667 Web: Easter Seals Easter Seals South Carolina -State Headquarters 3020 Farrow Road Columbia, SC 29203-7099 Phone: (803) 256-0735 Web: Easter Seals South Carolina -Anderson County 1104 Ella Street … [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 11:40 am
., upon the confirmation of his son to his seat on the Middle District of North Carolina. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
While granting the motion to file, the Court turned down a request from South Carolina seeking to bar North Carolina temporarily from authoizing any excess diversions of water from the river (Application 06A1150). [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:56 am
North Carolina holds that a failure to properly announce was not a "substantial violation" of the state search rule, and it was not the cause of finding the evidence inside under an otherwise valid search warrant. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 10:13 am
Moore was breaking up, that she was packing up his belongings, that there was only a possibility that she would allow him to return, and that he was located months later with his girlfriend in North Carolina. [read post]