Search for: "In re INITIATIVE STATE QUESTION NO. 10." Results 81 - 100 of 4,368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Terry Briscoe
The rule seems unnecessary to meet its stated goal of “more effectively administering the NLRA” and “removing barriers to the fair and expeditious resolution of questions concerning representation. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In re Certified Questions, however, essentially ignored Michigan even while ostensibly discussing Michigan’s Constitution. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm by Brad Schnure
Testa also questioned why people are being required to register to testify by April 10 for hearings that will take place into May. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 10:51 am
Whether it was in Britain or over here in the States, the questions never really seemed to change from job to job. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 5:46 am by Sang-Min Kim
The post Early Edition for August 10, 2022 appeared first on Just Security. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 5:31 pm
Initial "Hearings" should be in the form of meetings, under oath, with "A" Bar Examiner, where questions are asked. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:14 am by Robert Z. Cashman
State Bar Op. 709 (operating proposed law practice under trade name ‘The Trademark Store’ is impermissible); In re Shephard, 459 N.Y.S.2d 632, 633 (3rd Dep’t1983) (finding ‘The Peoples Law Firm’ was a prohibited trade name); In re Shapiro, 455 N.Y.S. 2d 604, 605 (1st Dep’t 1982) (finding ‘Peoples Legal Clinic, Inc. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 9:18 pm by Charles Bieneman
Patent 6,560,217, raised a substantial new question of patentability concerning claims 1-3 and 8-10, but that the other three references did not raise substantial new questions of patentability. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:57 am by Dan Lips
“We’re asking them to participate in national security. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 6:19 am
He stated (at paragraph 32):"The point is really quite short and simple. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 12:44 pm by Daniel M. Kowalski
Initial or re-entering students must enroll in programs complying with the regulatory limits for distance learning as stated in 8 CFR 214.2(f)(6)(i)(G). [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:31 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The states that were selected to receive these grants will use the funds for a variety of improvements and initiatives, including enhancing employer audit programs and conducting employer education initiatives. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 2:33 pm
This conference seeks to promote conversation around these themes, including but not limited to the following questions. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 12:22 pm by Ryan
 Despite being the person to initially raise the question of her eligibility I wasn’t worthy of so much of footnote from either the trial court or the Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:49 pm by Christina Carroll
The Supreme Court is scheduled to consider whether to grant a petition for writ of mandamus in one of the first major climate change-related tort cases, In re Comer, No. 10-294, in conference on January 7, 2010. [read post]