Search for: "In Re Application of Lawrence"
Results 81 - 100
of 481
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2010, 7:00 am
It's because we're not as easily marketable, lacking that grade A stamp on our foreheads that provides objective proof that if we were good enough for government work, we're good enough for them. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 12:35 pm
Respectfully submitted, Lawrence R. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 2:38 pm
Lawrence Cities Initiative (“Initiative”), which had challenged the June 2016 diversion approval the City received from the Great Lakes Compact Council, announced that it would not pursue further remedies in federal court. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 2:38 pm
Lawrence Cities Initiative (“Initiative”), which had challenged the June 2016 diversion approval the City received from the Great Lakes Compact Council, announced that it would not pursue further remedies in federal court. [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:33 am
Would the application of an abortion ban to such methods of contraception be sustained under the rational basis test of Dobbs? [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm
Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (David Lawrence III of counsel), for respondent. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm
Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (David Lawrence III of counsel), for respondent. [read post]
29 Oct 2016, 3:17 pm
This arbitration clause was not good enough, and the plaintiffs win the appeal.The case is Lawrence v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 1:33 pm
The Court indicated it could not use the precedent of In re Lawrence to order the beneficiary to have the property be delivered from a discretionary trust without joinder of the trustee. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
The claimants, who include the Duke of Sussex, Guy Ritchie, Hugh Grant and Doreen Lawrence, sought to add further evidence to their claim, including 235 stories which appeared in the Sun and News of the World between 1994 and 2016. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 3:31 am
In re Lawrence, 237 B.R. 61 (D. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 3:31 am
In re Lawrence, 237 B.R. 61 (D. [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 3:36 am
The applications scheduled for review by the Commission (Form 8s) are now up to date, and the reported decisions of the Commission (Form 10s) re now available for 18 July 2024and 5 September 2024. [read post]
21 May 2008, 2:11 pm
Gould, writing for the majority of the Witt panel, Lawrence v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 3:51 am
Any lawyer whose application was not accepted is required to wait a minimum of 18 months before re-applying: “This will ensure that such applicant has sufficient time to engage in additional training and/or gather additional relevant experience. [read post]
11 May 2007, 7:20 am
You sure ain't boring, Lawrence -- your morality is emotional as well as intellectual -- and you're always perfectly INTELLIGIBLE. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 2:36 am
And we’re posting memos in our “Hedging” Practice Area. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 2:06 am
Lawrence Toot Baldon [2023] ECC Oxf 10 in which a confirmatory faculty was sought for an unauthorized leger stone; and Re St. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 2:32 pm
In re Lawrence, 237 B.R. 61 (D. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am
by Lawrence Douglas [Note from ed.: This is the final commentary on Kevin Heller's book,The Nuremberg Military Tribunals and the Origins of International Criminal Law. [read post]
