Search for: "In re Egan" Results 81 - 100 of 115
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2013, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
This is because of two SEC no-action letters issued in 2004, Egan-Jones Proxy Services and Institutional Shareholder Services, which effectively encouraged  the outsourcing of voting authority to proxy advisory firms. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 1:09 pm by Alex R. McQuade
Reuters reports that Hou Le, one of China’s senior counterterrorism officials, stated “we’re facing a grim task in fighting terrorism, and we hope participating countries will work together with Chinese policy to ensure the safety of such large-scale meetings. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 2:22 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
In Germany, Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière, who disagrees with Chancellor Angela Merkel’s staunch support for accepting refugees, has warned against making connections between refugee inflows and terrorism. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:13 am by SHG
Egan told Smith that Ceresia's decision was discretionary, prompting Smith to ask, "How can science be discretionary? [read post]
18 May 2012, 8:23 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Egan-Jones Proxy Services, which advises institutional investors, recommended on Thursday that shareholders vote against re-electing Wal-Mart’s chief executive, Michael T. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In two separate appeals (“Music I” [Appeal No. 21,948] and “Music II” [sic Appeal No. 21,978]), Petitioner challenged decisions by the Board of Education and the School Superintendent [collectively, “Respondents"].Because these appeals arose out of similar facts and circumstances and presented  similar issues of law, they were consolidated for decision by the Commissioner of Education.The Commissioner, holding that Music I must be dismissed,… [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In two separate appeals (“Music I” [Appeal No. 21,948] and “Music II” [sic Appeal No. 21,978]), Petitioner challenged decisions by the Board of Education and the School Superintendent [collectively, “Respondents"].Because these appeals arose out of similar facts and circumstances and presented  similar issues of law, they were consolidated for decision by the Commissioner of Education.The Commissioner, holding that Music I must be dismissed,… [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 11:01 am by Cody Poplin
Parting Shot: We’re renewing an old Onion video, which encapsulates the current debate surrounding the CIA’s interrogation techniques. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 9:55 am
A few weeks earlier, he went on immediately following a nasty McGuirk parody of Cardinal Egan, including a line about how you know when a black woman is menstruating. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:38 pm by INFORRM
  In some cases this has been done by reference to Article 8 of the Convention (see Gaskin v United Kingdom (1989) 12 EHRR 36 paras 37, 52; see also McGinley and Egan v United Kingdom (1998) 27 EHRR 1). [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
  Initially, this was done by reference to Article 8 of the Convention (see Gaskin v United Kingdom (1989) 12 EHRR 36 paras 37, 52; see also McGinley and Egan v United Kingdom (1998) 27 EHRR 1). [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 7:49 pm by The White Law Group
”  SEC Charges Western International re GWG L Bonds  May 2020 – Western International Securities agreed to sanctions over its alleged failure to amend U4 reports on more than 10% of its approximately 475 brokers to disclose liens, judgments and/or bankruptcies against them totaling more than $5.6 million. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:54 am by Lovechilde
” New York Times columnist Tim Egan has labeled the post-Citizens United era “your democracy on meth. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 6:18 am by Jim Sedor
Louis Post-Dispatch – Kurt Erickson | Published: 9/13/2016 A state appeals court ruled that a measure re-imposing campaign contribution limits in Missouri can be placed on the November ballot. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 6:17 pm by Alan Rozenshtein
Damrah, 412 F.3d 618 (6th Cir. 2005), in which the court found that the introduction of FISA-derived evidence in a criminal trial did not violate the defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights); or if telecommunications companies directed to help the government brought suit (as occurred in In re Directives, 551 F.3d 1004 (2008), which upheld pre-FAA FISA amendments against a Fourth Amendment challenge). [read post]