Search for: "In re Walter S. (1980)" Results 81 - 92 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
 Two epidemiologic studies of PPA and hemorrhagic stroke were conducted in the 1980s. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
It is only within this context that both Reagan’s and Trump’s deregulatory efforts can be understood. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:13 pm by Adam Thierer
Why the “Public Interest” Regulatory Regime Can’t Continue There’s always been a bit of mythology surrounding so-called “public interest” regulation of broadcasting in America.[3] Those who advocate expansive regulatory obligations for licensed radio and television operators typically claim they’re directing the content or character of broadcasting toward a nobler end—a sort of noblesse oblige for the Information Age. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:23 pm
There, in a recent post titled A History Of The "Lie Detector" Norm Pattis writes, "I doubt I will ever forget the polygraph exam that I failed back in the early 1980s. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 12:12 pm by Robert Bennett
Of course, the easy selection would be Michael Nifong, the former District Attorney for Durham, North Carolina who was motivated by his own re-election and engaged in unethical, and probably criminal, conduct in the prosecution of three Duke University Lacrosse players. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
“For those fifteen years, John Stevens has essentially served as the Chief Justice of the Liberal Supreme Court,” Walter Dellinger, who was the acting Solicitor General in the Clinton Administration and is a frequent advocate before the Court, says. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
“For those fifteen years, John Stevens has essentially served as the Chief Justice of the Liberal Supreme Court,” Walter Dellinger, who was the acting Solicitor General in the Clinton Administration and is a frequent advocate before the Court, says. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Walter Shaub, the former director of the Office of Government Ethics, compared the Ricchetti brothers’ situation to an instance from former President Trump’s tenure. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 3:26 pm by David Cheifetz
In my view, the appellants are asking this court to re-examine all the evidence and to come to different conclusions than those reached by the trial judge – i.e., to retry the case. [read post]