Search for: "Joshua Matz"
Results 81 - 100
of 117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2025, 1:36 pm
Joshua Matz, representing Dellinger, began by describing Dellinger’s position as head of the OSC, which oversees complaints from federal whistleblowers. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 4:58 am
In the Los Angeles Times, Jim Newton reviews both Uncertain Justice, a new book on the Roberts Court by Laurence Tribe and Joshua Matz, and the new biography of Justice Antonin Scalia, by Bruce Murphy. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 4:15 am
” At Take Care, Joshua Matz, introducing excerpts from an amicus brief filed in the entry-ban cases on behalf of a group of constitutional law scholars, argues that “the President’s public statements—before and after inauguration—about why he issued his executive order” constitute “admissions of anti-Muslim animus. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:51 am
” And at Just Enrichment, Joshua Matz (also of this blog) describes himself as “similarly skeptical of the notion that we can read very much into the Court’s oral argument grant. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 6:37 am
” Briefly: At Just Enrichment, Joshua Matz of this blog reviews Five Chiefs, the recent memoir by retired Justice John Paul Stevens. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 4:30 am
” At Take Care, Joshua Matz argues that “[t]he Supreme Court is now a co-owner and co-author of the travel ban,” and that “with that position comes major institutional risk to the Supreme Court’s public legitimacy. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 4:35 am
” At Take Care, Joshua Matz describes an amicus brief he filed in the case, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:05 am
In The New York Review of Books, David Cole reviews three recent books on the Roberts Court – Uncertain Justice (by Laurence Tribe and former SCOTUSblog contributor Joshua Matz), In the Balance (by Mark Tushnet), and Scalia (by Bruce Murphy) – and concludes that “what most defines the Roberts Court may be its hostility to courts themselves. [read post]
8 May 2017, 2:08 pm
As our lawyer Joshua Matz explains in the briefs, the animus doctrine provides the clearest explanation of why Trump’s publicly-announced motives make the travel ban unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause, which has long been understood to prohibit the government from favoring or disfavoring any particular religion. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 7:00 am
Whether this claim can stand up to historical scrutiny remains doubtful, in light of analyses by John Mikhail (here and here), and by Joshua Matz and Larry Tribe. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 4:03 am
” Joshua Matz explains at Take Care why, contrary to “articles and tweets [that] have celebrated the Chief Justice for his bravery, principle, and (long-delayed) unwillingness to accept pretextual reasons for a Trump Administration policy” in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
In an op-ed for The Washington Post, Joshua Matz criticizes the Justice Department’s “new strategy for defending President Trump’s most controversial policies: Declare an urgent threat to the executive branch, bypass ordinary judicial procedure and rush straight to the Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 5:15 pm
” Joshua Matz: “The Imminent Demise of Chevron Deference? [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
” Josh Blackman and Joshua Matz discuss the argument in a podcast at Constitution Daily. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 3:59 am
” At Take Care, Joshua Matz “explain[s] why the government’s arguments against judicial review” in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:24 am
” In an op-ed for The Guardian, Joshua Matz highlights “three features of [Justice Anthony] Kennedy’s opinion that should be celebrated by progressives and members of the LGBTQ community. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:29 am
Reviews of Uncertain Justice, a new book on the Roberts Court by Laurence Tribe and Joshua Matz, come from this blog’s Stephen Wermiel, writing for The Washington Post, Jeff Bleich in the Los Angeles Review of Books, and Arthur Bryant at Public Justice. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 4:18 am
” In Wired, Laurence Tribe and Joshua Matz look at how the late Justice Antonin Scalia’s possible replacement by Gorsuch may affect the Supreme Court’s approach to technological issues, noting that when Gorsuch has been “faced with questions about faulty police databases and efforts to interdict child pornography in cyberspace, he has displayed a sensitivity to the underlying technology that suggests he may be more interested in these… [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
ONE MONTH INTO THE FIGHT OVER HEART AND SOUL NOT TO MENTION CONTROL OF THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAUDocket entry for 12/22 injunction hearing says "oral arguments heard. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
ONE MONTH INTO THE FIGHT OVER HEART AND SOUL NOT TO MENTION CONTROL OF THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU Docket entry for 12/22 injunction hearing says "oral arguments heard. [read post]
