Search for: "Loomis v. Loomis"
Results 81 - 100
of 114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2017, 2:21 pm
Alex Loomis posted a summary of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Ziglar v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 12:02 pm
Adam Chan discussed how the decision in Torres v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 5:43 am
As Jack noted earlier this morning, Lawfare's Alex Loomis has a fascinating new paper up on SSRN (for the moment, anyway) about the scope of Congress's Article I power to "define and punish . . . [read post]
18 Jun 2016, 1:00 pm
See also “The IARC Process is Broken” (May 4, 2016). [2] See Dana Loomis, Kathryn Guyton, Yann Grosse, Béatrice Lauby-Secretan, Fatiha El Ghissassi, Véronique Bouvard, Lamia Benbrahim-Tallaa, Neela Guha, Heidi Mattock, Kurt Straifon behalf of the IARC Monograph Working Group, “Carcinogenicity of drinking coffee, mate, and very hot beverages,” Lancet Oncology (2016 in press). [3] IARC, “Coffee, tea, mate, methylxanthines and… [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 2:19 pm
However, a 1979 case called Hackbart v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
Loomis, involving this issue. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 5:23 pm
The case of Loomis v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
See also Cupek v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Reese v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Reese v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Reese v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:08 pm
V. [read post]
13 May 2022, 10:55 am
See Loomis v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 1:33 pm
Cal.) in Crowley v. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 4:49 pm
Cal.) in Crowley v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 3:48 am
The European Court of Justice ruled against the Safe Harbor framework in Schrems v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:26 pm
As ever, SCOTUSBlog has the details on the case, Bank Markazi v. [read post]
Fourth Circuit Rules Against North Carolina State Professor Who Spoke Out Against Diversity Policies
8 Jul 2023, 4:26 am
For example, in Rankin v. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 5:34 am
Michael Knapp provided a primer on United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 12:09 pm
John Bellinger commented that the Alien Tort Statute case Doe v. [read post]