Search for: "Maria S. v. Doe"
Results 81 - 100
of 524
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2019, 4:48 am
”) State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 5:11 am
"By the way, the citizenship clause reverses the Supreme Court's decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 11:02 am
The district court relied on the Third Circuit’s prior decision in Snyder v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
In this one, Annsley reports about the speeches of Maria Martin-Prat (Head of Unit - Copyright, DG Connect at the European Commission), Michele Woods (Director, Copyright Law Division, WIPO), Maria Pallante (Register of Copyrights, US Copyright Office), and many others IP-enthusiasts about the role of copyright and trade marks in the new, digital, multisensory IP world.* Fordham 2016: Outstanding patent issues - the UPC, dual-track systems and Alice v CLS BankFrom trade… [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 2:40 pm
” Glaxo, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:44 am
The Tribunal held that there was both trade mark and copyright infringement.Anna Maria Stein outlined the findings of the UKIPO's report on “The impact of complicit social media influencers on male’s consumption of counterfeit goods in the UK. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:09 am
Also, the court does not accept the plaintiff’s argument that Dr. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
Sullivan, 372 U.S. 58 (1963), and the Seventh Circuit's decision in Backpage.com, LLC v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 10:06 am
Jane Doe 3Jane Doe 3, who was 10 years old at the time of trial, testified she sat on defendant's lap and played games on his computer. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 10:53 am
Doe v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 2:23 pm
The Ninth, happily, does not.United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:47 pm
The point was moot in this case because the court that tried the first suit (the Delhi High Court) would have had jurisdiction to entertain a s. 34 application, if maintainable (Fountain Head Developers v Maria Arcangela Sequeira, ¶ 14). [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 4:55 pm
The latest case against Iceland, Egill Einarsson v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 2:24 pm
Bruen, and the tech privacy implications of Dobbs v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 9:51 pm
The obvious fact that the entire population does not daily parade through the mall, much less reside there on a permanent basis - i.e., that the incidence of crime would have to be measured against the number of people at risk, rather than the city's population as a whole was merely acknowledged in passing.Trammell Crow Central Texas, Ltd v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 10:31 am
Submitted by Maria Pulzetti [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 3:20 pm
(Maria P. v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 10:28 am
While defendant's original appeal was pending, the United States Supreme Court decided Miller v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 8:57 am
This case arises from the defendants' public comments about Smartmatic and their claims that this company's software caused former President Trump to lose the 2020 election.The case is Smartmatic USA v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
Defense Attorneys: Maria K. [read post]
