Search for: "Mike Goldstein"
Results 81 - 100
of 158
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Goldstein’s analysis emphasizes that Section 4 states that the president returns to power “unless” a second declaration is made by the vice president and the Cabinet. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:51 am
Bonnie Goldstein of the Washington Post’s She The People blog looks at Tuesday’s arguments in Miller v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 4:07 am
’” Axios’ Mike Allen predicts that Trump’s pick will be “more about personality than pedigree. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 3:35 pm
The Associated Press article on this, by Mike Stobbe, is entitled, "CDC: US food poisoning cases held steady in 2008. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 8:07 pm
"Tillerson's State Department spokesman Steve Goldstein gives a press conference in which he states that Tillerson was fired by tweet when he landed at Dulles. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 4:45 am
Mary McNaughton-Cassill, Professor, Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at San AntonioA5: Built to Last: Creating Robust and Durable Ombuds Programs, David Michael, Senior Program Advisor, National Institutes of Health; Ellen Goldstein, Director & Ombuds, University of California, San Francisco; Ronnie Thomson, Independent ConsultantConcurrent Sessions: Block B B1: What Would a New Ombuds Do? [read post]
25 May 2021, 11:36 am
Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared the newest edition of the National Security Law Podcast, in which they interviewed Eric Goldstein, the executive assistant director for cybersecurity at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:09 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioners in this case.] [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 2:05 pm
Additionally, Mike Zechmeister, CFO of C.H. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:05 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the co-counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 6:36 am
” Bill Mears of CNN and Mike Allen of Politico also report on the Pentagon documents. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 6:14 am
Goldstein said. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:58 am
The Huffington Post’s Mike Sacks discusses how Judge Reinhardt’s narrow ruling, “with reasoning clearly designed for a future Kennedy decision,” might backfire by relying too heavily on Romer v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:04 am
” Briefly: At The Nation, Mike Konczal warns that the decision in Ohio v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:09 am
Coverage comes from Mike Sacks at the Blog of Legal Times, Greg Stohr of Bloomberg, and Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal. [read post]
23 May 2007, 8:46 pm
I'd also like to share the list of people David thanks because I've checked out quite a few and all those I've seen so far are fabulous bloggers: Robert Scoble ScobleizerAdele Revella Buyer Persona Blog Joe Wikert Publishing 2020 blog Steve Johnson David McInnis Mark Levy David Hamm Mike Levin Colin Delaney epolitics Steve Goldstein Alacrablog Todd Van Hoosear George L Smyth Eclectic Mix Mark Effinger Michelle Manafy EContent magazine Kevin Rose Diggnation Grub… [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:43 am
" These and other enlightening details were revealed in the deposition of Mike Davis (pdf), second-chair at Michael Morton's false conviction 25 years ago, has been made public. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:51 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog, serves as counsel to the petitioners in Mohamad, but the author of this post is not involved in the case.] [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 8:44 am
. ;-) Sherri Al-Ashari, Bill Babcock, Andy Berkowitz, Ina Bresner, Cindy Brown, Chris Burke, Chris Butler, Gil Cote, Paul Couto, Charlie Crosby, Edith Desmond, Bobby Drogo, John Drogo, Leslie Evans, Chris Evans, Wilson Farrar, Mike Feinstein, Paul Fox, Karl Gazarian, Joe Geary, Glen B. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:12 am
Illinois (which Tom Goldstein previewed), the Court is considering whether a court violates a criminal defendant’s Confrontation Clause rights by allowing an expert witness to testify about the results of DNA testing conducted by another analyst who has not appeared as a witness at trial. [read post]
