Search for: "Montana v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 994
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2008, 6:36 am
Montana State Auditor’s Office, News Release (March 31, 2008) Montana State Auditor John [...] [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Thus, the measure was nearly identical to the ban in federal law that was struck down by the Supreme Court in January of last year in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:31 am by Brian Wolfman
Barnes says that the Supreme Court may just summarily reverse the Montana decision on the basis of Citizens United. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:50 am by Orin Kerr
Justice Nelson (joined by Justice Wheat) suggests that under United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 5:07 pm by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court today granted certiorari in Espinoza v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:16 am by Eric Goldman
The law, in its preamble, stated these objectives: WHEREAS, the People’s Republic of China is an adversary of the United States and Montana and has an interest in gathering information about Montanans, Montana companies, and the intellectual property of users to engage in corporate and international espionage…. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 6:36 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
An excerpt: Two families from the Crow Indian Reservation in Montana can proceed with a lawsuit against an F.B.I. agent that accuses him of failing to properly investigate crimes against American Indians on and around the reservation, the United States Supreme Court has ruled. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:14 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The case is American Tradition Partnership, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 2:43 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Montana is the first decision by an appellate court in the United States recognizing a constitutional right to a "stable climate. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:15 am by Kiran Bhat
The Montana Supreme Court upheld the ban in December, but three Montana corporations have asked the Supreme Court to stay the enforcement of that decision and, eventually, reverse it, on the ground that the lower court’s ruling conflicts with the Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]