Search for: "Nate Persily" Results 81 - 100 of 142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2020, 2:01 am by Jen Patja Howell
Benjamin Wittes checked in with Nate Persily, the James B. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by JB
Nate Persily, The Paradox of Political Problem Perception (or if you will, Persily's Paradox)9. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 2:35 pm by Rick Hasen
Nate and Charles at Slate: Americans need to be prepared for the possibility of experiencing a roller coaster ride as the votes are counted, especially in the first couple of hours after the polls close. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 3:55 pm
Nate's Yale Law Journal article on the renewed VRA is now available. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 5:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
I was representing friends of the court, 19 academics, authors, ex-prosecutors, and ex-judges on all sides of the political spectrum — ranging from Professor Alan Dershowitz, Professor Nate Persily, Jeff Blackburn (Innocence Project of Texas), and former Texas Supreme Court justice Raul A. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 7:23 am by Rick Hasen
who has been named an Andrew Carnegie Fellow for his work on “The Campaign of the Future. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 8:47 pm
Nate Persily has posted “Fig Leaves and Tea Leaves in the Supreme Court’s Recent Election Law Decisions” on SSRN, see here. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:44 am by Rick Hasen
Elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 8:17 am by
Check this out: "Students in one Columbia Law School class will be able to do more than talk about what happens when Congressional districts are redrawn following the census. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 8:12 am by Rick Hasen
Following court assignment, the NY congressional maps are out. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 8:00 pm by pittlegalscholarship
Columbia Nate Persily (Columbia), Race, Region, and Vote Choice in the 2008 Election: Implications for the Future of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 9:08 am by Heather K. Gerken
As Nate Persily notes below, as a practical matter, the opinion is just one more step in the direction the Court was already heading. [read post]