Search for: "National Can Corp. v. Department of Revenue" Results 81 - 100 of 160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:German Federal Constitutional Court: unauthorised government surveillance of personal computers breaches individual’s right to privacy: (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am by Marty Lederman
The Act requires the nation’s largest employers to share in the national burden of ensuring the comprehensive social benefit of comprehensive, affordable health insurance coverage. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
” Three years later, in Back to the Internet Taxation Future, reacting to a reappearance of the proposal to permit state 1 to require retailers in state 2 with no state 1 connection to be taxed by state 1, I explained why progress had not been made, pointing out the inability of legislators and others to distinguish between sales and use taxes, the silliness of claims that internet retailers are not required to collect sales taxes at all for any state, the unwillingness of state legislatures… [read post]
Because the state tax authority issued an assessment based on its examination of the taxpayer’s books and records, an assessment is afforded a presumption of correctness.7 This presumption of correctness means that the department of revenue satisfied its prima facie requirement to establish the basis for an assessment. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 3:03 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
This section of ENDA consolidates several statutes protecting government workers from discrimination based on race, national origin, sex and religion. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 7:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
  Among the other agencies contributing to the plan are the New York City Departments of Buildings, Design and Construction, Emergency Management, Environmental Protection, Fire, Housing Preservation and Development, Parks and Recreation, Police, Small Business Services, Transportation, the Mayor's Office of Long Term Planning and Sustainability, the Landmarks Preservation Commission, the NY Harborway, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Empire State Development, New… [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 12:04 am
Bashman, Lawrence has failed to usher in an "anything goes" era, free from governmental interference. Intellectual Property Verdicts Exceed $1.3 Billion in 2006 The National Law Journal Amid expanding technology markets, last year's $117.3 million award in Finisar Corp. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in… [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC vacates FTC’s decision that Rambus breached antitrust duty by violating JEDEC patent disclosure rules and orders new trial: (Philip Brooks), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (IP Law360), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Hal Wegner), (IPBiz), (IP Law360), UK Court of Appeal rules on whether prior art not in the same design… [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: CAFC again affirms invalidation of claims to 'means'-defined elements involving a computer algorithm as indefinite: Net MoneyIN v Verisign (IP Updates) (IP Law Observer) (Patent Prospector) (PLI) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) (Law360) District Court: Patent term adjustments just got longer: Wyeth v Dudas… [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Legal knows it can’t be the department that always says no.Q: (1) what survey form/controls did you end up using that are public? [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore… [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
Congress, not this Court or the other federal courts, is the custodian of the national purse. . . [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: New USPTO procedures likely to delay action in requests for continued examination of patent applications (IP Spotlight) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) 12 Republican Senators send letter to Senate Majority Leader re concerns about post-grant review provisions in S.515 (Inventive Step) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Questions on… [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:00 am by Ronald Collins and David Hudson
Montana Department of Revenue (a 5-4 decision on the First Amendment’s religion clauses) revealed, sometimes unanimity or near unanimity must take a back seat to how the law is shaped. [read post]